Title. How many extensions would be the average to not be profiled? Obviously not having any or having 23 will make you pretty easy to fingerprint, so how many is the average or safest?

  • FIST_FILLET
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    but where do extensions come into the picture? i apologize if i’m missing something obvious here, but the only thing that article says about extensions is that blocking specific trackers counts as fingerprint data. but the VAST majority of my extensions aren’t blocking anything, they just customize the pages

    • crtbob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Having more extensions makes your browser fingerprint more unique, making it easier to tell you apart from other users.

      • FIST_FILLET
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        i’m comprehending that much, but i don’t understand how extensions “announce” themselves to the websites (except for content blockers). does my browser send a number corresponding to the amount of extensions i have installed? or are they listed out individually by hash or name?

        • sheogorath@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Not necessarily announce their existence. There’s some way for websites to communicate with extension like explained here. IMO, a sufficiently motivated actor can use this to add additional data point for fingerprinting.

          Although most of the methods are only applicable if you’re using Chrome or Chromium based browsers and Firefox has disabled the methods commonly used to extract information from the browser.