NATO will be able to be at war outside the scope of Article 5, without one of its members being attacked. The idea is to turn NATO into a “coalition of volunteer countries à la carte".

EnchantedWhetstones@lemmygrad.ml · 2 years ago

NATO will be able to be at war outside the scope of Article 5, without one of its members being attacked. The idea is to turn NATO into a “coalition of volunteer countries à la carte".

AgreeableLandscape · 2 years ago

I mean, hasn’t this always been the case?

When countries like Vietnam and Venezuela were “”“attacked”“” (read, their own citizens got fed up with their government’s shit and decided to have a go at socialism), the vanguards of “democracy” NATO definitely felt the need to “save” them (which, the people of a country saying GTFO to a capitalist government and trying to implement socialism is probably the most democratic thing possible).

EnchantedWhetstones@lemmygrad.ml · 2 years ago

NATO has never been p u r e l y d e f e n s i v e . Pretty much the only difference I see is people stop being able to post the “evil grinning Polish wojack pointing at the ARTICLE FIVE button” meme. Making this a net victory for NATO? I think? My honest read: this is a declaration of intent to go hog wild.

NATO will be able to be at war outside the scope of Article 5, without one of its members being attacked. The idea is to turn NATO into a “coalition of volunteer countries à la carte".

NATO will be able to be at war outside the scope of Article 5, without one of its members being attacked. The idea is to turn NATO into a “coalition of volunteer countries à la carte".

archive.ph