• pingveno
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      It literally says the opposite of that on page 12.

      This analysis and common political science definitions show that genocide, fascist, junta, and terrorism are not appropriate terms to define the conflict in Donbas.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        The study chooses to avoid using the term genocide, but if you actually read it you will see that it clearly states that the conflict is based around national identity and ethnicity. It also documents lots of crimes committed by the Maidan regime, and genuine desire from the people of Donbas and Crimea to separate from Ukraine. If you bother reading other sources I’ve provided above then I don’t know how you can claim that the regime is not involved in ethnic cleansing.

        • pingveno
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          The paper doesn’t avoid the topic of genocide. It categorically and explicitly rules out genocide by name. And just because a conflict is based around national identity and ethnicity does not automatically make it a genocide. Nor do acts of violence. This is war.