• @zurohki@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    429 months ago

    It’s not that it’s broken, it’s that the open source driver stack and AMD cards are a superior experience. The Nvidia Linux driver is just like the Windows driver.

    • Bob
      link
      fedilink
      79 months ago

      I think it’s more that they are broken (esp. on Wayland) and that they are closed source and that they are not pre-installed in Mesa and that they lack basic features such as GAMMA_LUT for night light on Wayland…

      • @Dashmaybe@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        09 months ago

        To clarify on why it’s especially terrifying, for the nVidia drivers to be closed source, they’ve been allowed to add binaries into the Linux kernel. Nobody but nVidia knows what those binaries actually contain.

      • @Bulletdust@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        -19 months ago

        Meanwhile, Wayland itself is still in a state of perpetual beta and lacks basic functionality regarding a vast number of features.

        • @kaba0@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          08 months ago

          It comes by default on plenty of distros and people don’t even notice the change.

          In the meanwhile, nvidia doesn’t support the linux kernel itself (though it is changing slowly) that’s why it can’t support wayland.

          • @Bulletdust@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            0
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Except people do notice the change, as a workaround many still rely on certain aspects of X via Xwayland in an attempt to keep things running. Even Steam doesn’t support Wayland.

            Fact is, Wayland’s been in development for a good decade or more, it’s still in a state of perpetual beta, and that’s a situation that isn’t likely to change any time soon.

            • @kaba0@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              08 months ago

              You do realize that the whole of meaningful architecture we have builds on, and often gives way for legacy ones? XWayland is made by Wayland, because obviously not every software will port overnight or ever. That’s a positive thing.

              It’s almost like the linux community is not controlled by a dictator like Apple, where they can just say “we are using this API from next version, if you wanna work, port”. Wayland required a critical mass before it actually started flying - but it definitely flies now.

              • @Bulletdust@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Xwayland makes use of legacy features of X. If we were to compleately drop all aspects of X tomorrow, the Linux desktop would essentially compleately break and become unusable.

                The fact is, at this point in time after 10 years or more of development, Wayland is still very much in a state of perpetual beta. At this point in time, and for the foreseeable future, Wayland involves compromises that make it unsuitable for many users.

                Hopefully things improve in time, the problem is development is progressing at snails pace.