@kixik to Privacy • 10 months agoGoogle’s nightmare “Web Integrity API” wants a DRM gatekeeper for the webarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square45arrow-up1565arrow-down19file-textcross-posted to: technologytechnology@beehaw.orgdegooglestallmanwasrighthackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fansprivacy@chat.maiion.comtechnology@hexbear.netprogramming@programming.dev
arrow-up1556arrow-down1external-linkGoogle’s nightmare “Web Integrity API” wants a DRM gatekeeper for the webarstechnica.com@kixik to Privacy • 10 months agomessage-square45file-textcross-posted to: technologytechnology@beehaw.orgdegooglestallmanwasrighthackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fansprivacy@chat.maiion.comtechnology@hexbear.netprogramming@programming.dev
minus-square@Samsylink4•10 months agoI have to ask this, if I use grapheneOS with a Firefox browser like mull and my search engine isn’t google, do I have to give a fuck about this DRM bullshit?
minus-square@nehal3m@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink3•10 months agoYes you do, because websites will filter out devices that can’t be remotely attested. You will be locked out of the commercial web.
minus-square@nehal3m@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink2•10 months agoIt’s a tragedy to lose the open access web, yes.
minus-square@shiham@lemmy.shihaam.melinkfedilink2•10 months agoif websites you need start using it, then yes.
I have to ask this, if I use grapheneOS with a Firefox browser like mull and my search engine isn’t google, do I have to give a fuck about this DRM bullshit?
Yes you do, because websites will filter out devices that can’t be remotely attested. You will be locked out of the commercial web.
Ohh well, that’s sad, isn’t it?
It’s a tragedy to lose the open access web, yes.
if websites you need start using it, then yes.