Generally speaking, the smaller the forum, the less value it has to discredit or use. If it’s small enough to be easy, it’s small enough to not matter.
My bet is on “it’s more important to be anti-American than to be pro-left”.
I feel the same way. But I wish the arguments brought up by these “anti-american first” people were more balanced. And balanced does not mean less anti-american, but just to also keep a critical view on Russia.
An comparison could be with capitalist companies : I deeply hate Facebook. But if it was contested by a new capitalist tech giant on its own market, I would never mindlessly support this new adversary just because I’m anti-Facebook.
Just as I think anticapitalism should critizise any capitalist power, any country as powerful as the US or Russia should also be criticized for this kind of action.
This really has war propaganda vibes. Either you are with us, or against us.
This really has war propaganda vibes. Either you are with us, or against us.
Could it be any other way? Groups/movements/ideologies that aren’t like this have lower survival odds. Thus evolution weeds them out. Self-awareness being the most limited resource in the universe, those same people are quite certain they’re in the right about it, too…
I think I see what you mean and mostly agree. I just have to add a little optimism by pointing out that sels-awareness is not a “ressource”, as having it does not limit the supply for others. It is a characteristic. Keeping the evolutionist mindset, I would then argue that the spreading or disappearing of a characteristic depend on the environment. So we should collectively socially promote characteristics we want to see grow ! Let’s celebrate radicality, self-awarenes, curiosity, etc. !
Generally speaking, the smaller the forum, the less value it has to discredit or use. If it’s small enough to be easy, it’s small enough to not matter.
My bet is on “it’s more important to be anti-American than to be pro-left”.
I feel the same way. But I wish the arguments brought up by these “anti-american first” people were more balanced. And balanced does not mean less anti-american, but just to also keep a critical view on Russia.
An comparison could be with capitalist companies : I deeply hate Facebook. But if it was contested by a new capitalist tech giant on its own market, I would never mindlessly support this new adversary just because I’m anti-Facebook.
Just as I think anticapitalism should critizise any capitalist power, any country as powerful as the US or Russia should also be criticized for this kind of action.
This really has war propaganda vibes. Either you are with us, or against us.
Could it be any other way? Groups/movements/ideologies that aren’t like this have lower survival odds. Thus evolution weeds them out. Self-awareness being the most limited resource in the universe, those same people are quite certain they’re in the right about it, too…
I think I see what you mean and mostly agree. I just have to add a little optimism by pointing out that sels-awareness is not a “ressource”, as having it does not limit the supply for others. It is a characteristic. Keeping the evolutionist mindset, I would then argue that the spreading or disappearing of a characteristic depend on the environment. So we should collectively socially promote characteristics we want to see grow ! Let’s celebrate radicality, self-awarenes, curiosity, etc. !
So do you want the copypaste sentiments of 80% USA + West EU non critical thinking Redditors here too?