• pingveno
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    Of course, no energy source is going to be without its issues and impacts. Wind and solar are intermittent. Battery technology just isn’t there yet for a whole-grid battery, and the amount of resources involved in creating those batteries with current technology would be its own environmental impact. You need a baseline power source, and nuclear fills that niche well.

    • roastpotatothief
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      For me, it’s not a choice, you need all of them. None of these technologies can alone feed the huge energy appetites of data-centres.

      Tidal power is under-exploited today and has huge potential. Nuclear and bio-diesel could have complementary huge roles. Wind-power is 100x less efficient than tidal, but it can be used inland.

      I just want people to do their sums. Politicians are today planning nuclear plants, but forgetting about the huge fallout from decommissioning and toxic waste.

      • pingveno
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 years ago

        Yeah, it’s gotta be all of the above. We don’t have time to eliminate viable options just because they have some downsides.