I’m with you-- I have a hard time feeling bad for business owners and I’m far more concerned with employees being able to earn a livable wage. $18.75/hour is still far from a living wage and the expectation that anyone should be willing to work with zero vacation, paid or unpaid, is absurd and out of touch.
I used to be of the mindset that I should make a conscious effort to buy local but in the recent years I’ve realized that many business owners who don’t pay their employees a livable wage just use "buy local" as a way to mislead consumers into thinking they’re helping out working class people when in reality, they’re unknowingly just making business owners wealthier than they already are.
Even small business owners whose businesses are suffering… I really have a hard time feeling bad for them given the fact that it’s their employees who are suffering far more. If the business ultimately fails, again I don’t see why it makes sense to feel more empathy for a failed business owner than their employees, as both parties are now unemployed and the business owner most likely owns assets at least worth something while the employees likely own little to no assets.
All these people talking about how minimum wage does little good… it’s baffling to read their comments because it’s almost as if they’ve never made a genuine effort to stop and think about how much more exploitation of working class people there would be if we got rid of minimum wage. This is the kind of mindset that glorifies child labor and sells it as an experience that builds character, while disingenuously leaving out all the negative aspects of child labor that ultimately come to a country’s detriment more than benefit.
Care to point me in the directions of some materials you’d like me to read? Most leftist opinions I’ve observed over the years are quite clearly in favor of increased minimum wage that keeps up with inflation, so I’m very curious to know what leftist critiques you’re referring to. It seems to me that conservatives and neoliberals are in favor of keeping minimum wage low and not in line with inflation.
Given the fact that the majority of developed nations switch back and fourth between conservative and neoliberal governments who have both promoted minimum wage rates that are far below livable wages and don’t take inflation into account, I have a hard time believing what you’re saying but again, I’m open to reading any materials you’d suggest.
I get what you’re saying, but I think you’re missing my point. The USA is not like European countries such as Sweden. For where the USA is at right now, it makes sense to focus on minimum wage being a livable wage and that doesn’t preclude efforts for strong unionization and collective bargaining being made.
No minimum wage in the USA would not at all be like no minimum wage in Sweden. It’s a completely different situation and to compare the USA with European countries that don’t have minimum wage but do have strong unions, meaningful collective bargaining and high taxation that gives rise to the average working class person not having to deal with the struggles that the average American working class person has to deal with.
If minimum wage was abolished in the USA or it wasn’t prioritized, all you’d end up with is workers being even more exploited and having far less time to organize strong unions-- which is exactly what’s happening in the USA right now with minimum wage being as low as it is.
First, even someone like myself who find the idea of minimum wage laughable wouldn’t really propose abolishing the minimum wage. Just let it sort of be forgotten.
That avoids the worst of the problems that might come from abandoning it. And truly, if we could run the experiment and see the results, I have my doubts that we’d find people offering 25¢/hr… sure, there’d be trolls out there claiming it to rile people up, but you can’t get work out of anorexically-starved people. The fast food place near my office has “$14/hr” emblazoned on their marquee right now. Minimum wage is already moot almost everywhere, even without it being raised.
But there’s just no reason to run that experiment, and if you think it could end in disaster, I see no reason to demand that out of spite.
What we might do instead (and the libertarian in me objects strongly just on principle) is to focus on some sort of restrictions for offering part-time work. Can’t prohibit it entirely (there may be situations where they only need 20 hours of labor per week), but we could make sure that they’re not doing it just to dick with people and keep their paychecks low. That seems to me like it’s much closer to an unfair bargaining tactic than it is to anything reasonably needed for them to conduct business.
Imagine a scenario where grocery stores sold meals/food/ingredients in portions too small for even a single person. At that point, people would probably be compelled (I like this word better than “forced”) to buy them. Because they were compelled to do so, the prices would rise.
There is a finite amount of food, some of which is packaged in portions-too-small. Because of the less-than-widespread availability of normal-sized portions, some people simply have to get the too-small-portions… it’s all that’s left. Since people buy them at inflated prices, this causes food distributors to package yet more in the too-small-portions, higher profit margin. At some point, some equilibrium is reached, but by the time that happens it’s a large fraction that is sold Too Small™, and even the remainder carries a premium (since many people who don’t want to be gouged are bidding on a limited supply of normal portions).
In such a situation, it would be a legitimate power of government to put a stop to the nonsense and say “you’re not allowed to do that”. It doesn’t do so currently, because there’s no need to do that. For food. That situation is a little far-fetched, it is some local minimum that wouldn’t be easy to reach from where we are now, but would be quite sticky and hard to leave if circumstances ever did drive things there.
I think we’re stuck in that local minima now, for employment. If some business legitimately only needs 15 or 20 hours of labor per week, then there is no reason to disallow this. If there is a business that needs 400 hours of labor per week, then there is no reason to split that up among 20 part-time workers unless they are trying to manipulate the labor market.
It may be counter-intuitive that it’s possible to manipulate the market that way, and I doubt very much that most of them are perfectly aware that they’re doing it… but so many are partially aware of it. How many stories have I read on r/antiwork where someone’s griping that their manager is fucking with them by giving them zero-hour weeks and so on. Many more offer part-time because it sidesteps the requirement to offer medical insurance.
Since at least the first Bush term, I’ve heard the joke “the economy’s so great, everyone has a job followed up by the second guy saying yeh I know I have two of them”. This is a big deal, even if it doesn’t seem like it. And changing it might make a big difference.
Why do people like you treat leftism like it’s the boogeyman? Relax, there’s plenty of room for critiquing of minimum wage in leftist spaces-- I get the feeling you’re just exaggerating just because your flawed points have been refuted in leftist spaces with counterpoints that you disagree with.
You’re allowed to spout whatever opinions you want but even here in this thread, I don’t see a single person telling you that your critique isn’t allowed. Nobody implied that you want to be a slaveholder, someone just pointed out that your flawed reasoning is the same flawed reasoning that gave rise to slavery and child labor.
Again, no one here has told you that you aren’t allowed to critique minimum wage-- you’re making up a boogeyman to self-validate your false narrative. This website itself was created for "leftist privacy and FOSS enthusiasts” and you’re here critiquing minimum wage without anyone telling you that’s not allowed. Seriously, what are you even talking about?
Out of curiosity, have you ever worked 52 weeks in a row?
I don’t see why it makes sense to feel more empathy for a failed business owner than their employees, as both parties are now unemployed and the business owner most likely owns assets at least worth something while the employees likely own little to no assets.
I won’t tell you which you should feel more sorry for. It’s a pointless exercise. You feeling sorry for them won’t help them.
But if you supported the policy which caused them to be destitute, aren’t you the problem?
It’s this sort of magical thinking that if you raise the minimum wage by statute, that somehow everyone who is currently paid less than that will suddenly be paid more… it’s unrealistic. Fewer people will be employed at that higher rate, and the others will just have nothing.
What are you going to do about them? Do they just have to take one for the team?
I don’t recall saying or implying that me feeling sorry for employees more than business owners will help them. I do however believe feeling sorry for them is a step in the direction of understanding the struggles of employees, which is important to me as I’m interested in helping the majority of working class people.
But if you supported the policy which caused them to be destitute, aren’t you the problem?
What policy are you referring to, minimum wage? If so, are you really of the belief that abolishing minimum wage wouldn’t result in a sharp increase working class people struggling to make a living wage?
It’s this sort of magical thinking that if you raise the minimum wage by statute, that somehow everyone who is currently paid less than that will suddenly be paid more… it’s unrealistic. Fewer people will be employed at that higher rate, and the others will just have nothing.
So let me ask you… you really are of the belief that business owners who staunchly oppose minimum wage are doing so in part because they want what’s best for their employees? Come on, and you’re accusing me of “magical thinking”? Why do you think corporations are largely opposed to increases in minimum wage? Given the enormous wealth gap between the rich and the poor, something tells me these people can take one for their team and pay employees a livable wage.
Also, why did you avoid addressing the other points I made in my original comment?
I’m with you-- I have a hard time feeling bad for business owners and I’m far more concerned with employees being able to earn a livable wage. $18.75/hour is still far from a living wage and the expectation that anyone should be willing to work with zero vacation, paid or unpaid, is absurd and out of touch.
I used to be of the mindset that I should make a conscious effort to buy local but in the recent years I’ve realized that many business owners who don’t pay their employees a livable wage just use "buy local" as a way to mislead consumers into thinking they’re helping out working class people when in reality, they’re unknowingly just making business owners wealthier than they already are.
Even small business owners whose businesses are suffering… I really have a hard time feeling bad for them given the fact that it’s their employees who are suffering far more. If the business ultimately fails, again I don’t see why it makes sense to feel more empathy for a failed business owner than their employees, as both parties are now unemployed and the business owner most likely owns assets at least worth something while the employees likely own little to no assets.
All these people talking about how minimum wage does little good… it’s baffling to read their comments because it’s almost as if they’ve never made a genuine effort to stop and think about how much more exploitation of working class people there would be if we got rid of minimum wage. This is the kind of mindset that glorifies child labor and sells it as an experience that builds character, while disingenuously leaving out all the negative aspects of child labor that ultimately come to a country’s detriment more than benefit.
deleted by creator
Care to point me in the directions of some materials you’d like me to read? Most leftist opinions I’ve observed over the years are quite clearly in favor of increased minimum wage that keeps up with inflation, so I’m very curious to know what leftist critiques you’re referring to. It seems to me that conservatives and neoliberals are in favor of keeping minimum wage low and not in line with inflation.
Given the fact that the majority of developed nations switch back and fourth between conservative and neoliberal governments who have both promoted minimum wage rates that are far below livable wages and don’t take inflation into account, I have a hard time believing what you’re saying but again, I’m open to reading any materials you’d suggest.
deleted by creator
I get what you’re saying, but I think you’re missing my point. The USA is not like European countries such as Sweden. For where the USA is at right now, it makes sense to focus on minimum wage being a livable wage and that doesn’t preclude efforts for strong unionization and collective bargaining being made.
No minimum wage in the USA would not at all be like no minimum wage in Sweden. It’s a completely different situation and to compare the USA with European countries that don’t have minimum wage but do have strong unions, meaningful collective bargaining and high taxation that gives rise to the average working class person not having to deal with the struggles that the average American working class person has to deal with.
If minimum wage was abolished in the USA or it wasn’t prioritized, all you’d end up with is workers being even more exploited and having far less time to organize strong unions-- which is exactly what’s happening in the USA right now with minimum wage being as low as it is.
deleted by creator
First, even someone like myself who find the idea of minimum wage laughable wouldn’t really propose abolishing the minimum wage. Just let it sort of be forgotten.
That avoids the worst of the problems that might come from abandoning it. And truly, if we could run the experiment and see the results, I have my doubts that we’d find people offering 25¢/hr… sure, there’d be trolls out there claiming it to rile people up, but you can’t get work out of anorexically-starved people. The fast food place near my office has “$14/hr” emblazoned on their marquee right now. Minimum wage is already moot almost everywhere, even without it being raised.
But there’s just no reason to run that experiment, and if you think it could end in disaster, I see no reason to demand that out of spite.
What we might do instead (and the libertarian in me objects strongly just on principle) is to focus on some sort of restrictions for offering part-time work. Can’t prohibit it entirely (there may be situations where they only need 20 hours of labor per week), but we could make sure that they’re not doing it just to dick with people and keep their paychecks low. That seems to me like it’s much closer to an unfair bargaining tactic than it is to anything reasonably needed for them to conduct business.
deleted by creator
Imagine a scenario where grocery stores sold meals/food/ingredients in portions too small for even a single person. At that point, people would probably be compelled (I like this word better than “forced”) to buy them. Because they were compelled to do so, the prices would rise.
There is a finite amount of food, some of which is packaged in portions-too-small. Because of the less-than-widespread availability of normal-sized portions, some people simply have to get the too-small-portions… it’s all that’s left. Since people buy them at inflated prices, this causes food distributors to package yet more in the too-small-portions, higher profit margin. At some point, some equilibrium is reached, but by the time that happens it’s a large fraction that is sold Too Small™, and even the remainder carries a premium (since many people who don’t want to be gouged are bidding on a limited supply of normal portions).
In such a situation, it would be a legitimate power of government to put a stop to the nonsense and say “you’re not allowed to do that”. It doesn’t do so currently, because there’s no need to do that. For food. That situation is a little far-fetched, it is some local minimum that wouldn’t be easy to reach from where we are now, but would be quite sticky and hard to leave if circumstances ever did drive things there.
I think we’re stuck in that local minima now, for employment. If some business legitimately only needs 15 or 20 hours of labor per week, then there is no reason to disallow this. If there is a business that needs 400 hours of labor per week, then there is no reason to split that up among 20 part-time workers unless they are trying to manipulate the labor market.
It may be counter-intuitive that it’s possible to manipulate the market that way, and I doubt very much that most of them are perfectly aware that they’re doing it… but so many are partially aware of it. How many stories have I read on r/antiwork where someone’s griping that their manager is fucking with them by giving them zero-hour weeks and so on. Many more offer part-time because it sidesteps the requirement to offer medical insurance.
Since at least the first Bush term, I’ve heard the joke “the economy’s so great, everyone has a job followed up by the second guy saying yeh I know I have two of them”. This is a big deal, even if it doesn’t seem like it. And changing it might make a big difference.
Is that literally “less they starve”, or a broader “provides basic needs beyond nutrition”?
If the latter, would you mind giving a short overview of what you consider those basic needs to be?
deleted by creator
Are leftists even allowed to critique it? Or is leftism a religion that has such things baked into its dogma such that questioning it is blasphemy?
I mean, I point out how flawed the idea is, and I have people saying I want my logic implies I want to be a slaveholder or something.
Why do people like you treat leftism like it’s the boogeyman? Relax, there’s plenty of room for critiquing of minimum wage in leftist spaces-- I get the feeling you’re just exaggerating just because your flawed points have been refuted in leftist spaces with counterpoints that you disagree with.
You’re allowed to spout whatever opinions you want but even here in this thread, I don’t see a single person telling you that your critique isn’t allowed. Nobody implied that you want to be a slaveholder, someone just pointed out that your flawed reasoning is the same flawed reasoning that gave rise to slavery and child labor.
Again, no one here has told you that you aren’t allowed to critique minimum wage-- you’re making up a boogeyman to self-validate your false narrative. This website itself was created for "leftist privacy and FOSS enthusiasts” and you’re here critiquing minimum wage without anyone telling you that’s not allowed. Seriously, what are you even talking about?
Out of curiosity, have you ever worked 52 weeks in a row?
I won’t tell you which you should feel more sorry for. It’s a pointless exercise. You feeling sorry for them won’t help them.
But if you supported the policy which caused them to be destitute, aren’t you the problem?
It’s this sort of magical thinking that if you raise the minimum wage by statute, that somehow everyone who is currently paid less than that will suddenly be paid more… it’s unrealistic. Fewer people will be employed at that higher rate, and the others will just have nothing.
What are you going to do about them? Do they just have to take one for the team?
I don’t recall saying or implying that me feeling sorry for employees more than business owners will help them. I do however believe feeling sorry for them is a step in the direction of understanding the struggles of employees, which is important to me as I’m interested in helping the majority of working class people.
What policy are you referring to, minimum wage? If so, are you really of the belief that abolishing minimum wage wouldn’t result in a sharp increase working class people struggling to make a living wage?
So let me ask you… you really are of the belief that business owners who staunchly oppose minimum wage are doing so in part because they want what’s best for their employees? Come on, and you’re accusing me of “magical thinking”? Why do you think corporations are largely opposed to increases in minimum wage? Given the enormous wealth gap between the rich and the poor, something tells me these people can take one for their team and pay employees a livable wage.
Also, why did you avoid addressing the other points I made in my original comment?