You’re the one making the claims. I see no citations. Burden of proof is on you.

That is laughably wrong

Not the commenter you responded to, but here are a few examples:

• https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circassian_genocide
• https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Terror_(Russia)
• https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Terror

More examples:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_war_crimes

Further reading:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Territorial_evolution_of_Russia

How did that post have anything to do with Firefox? Of course it was removed. It’s completely off-topic.

What do you consider critically important about it?

“Not positive” in this context means “unsure” (i.e., the above commenter is unsure about whether or not OBS works in Wayland, but they rely on some other software which they know is incompatible with Wayland)

Yeah, like, what’s the purpose of your current adventure?

It most certainly is

…I’m not crying, you’re crying!

Neat, I’ll check it out.

Such a good idea. Didn’t even know I was looking for this. I’m going to try it in my next project.

In my experience, I have only ever worked against my ADHD for the sake of relationships that I consider more important than my comfort/sanity. And I’d do it the same way, if I had to do it again. But it’s not easy, and it’s not ideal.

Fuck Ben Shapiro.

That’s great news. I’m glad I could help. I find that when you roll with your ADHD instead of against it, for certain problems like this, you can often find some peace and flow. Let yourself wander, and don’t feel like your personal projects are obligations in some way; they’re yours, so they can just be yours… unfinished or finished, good or bad.

I want to do a programming project with Lisp; but I can’t start a project; there’s so many ideas to choose.

I’ve dealt with this. The trick is to do one that you don’t care too much about. You think of a crappy idea, and you start it. After a couple weeks of working on it in your free time, you might get bored and start some other idea and decide to come back to it later. It’s okay—start the new thing. You may not ever come back to it (I almost never do) but it will break your block. Eventually you’ll have a halfway decent idea that you’ll keep working on for a longer period of time, and you’ll be satisfied.

I won’t comment on the disagreement you two have, but I want to tell you that despite your disclaimer you have lost all credibility by linking to Project Veritas. Not digging on you, personally, but they literally fabricate stories to fit a far-right and conservative-funded agenda. It’s what they do, and it’s public knowledge. So, linking to their disinformation in order to support an argument you are making constitutes either a complete lack of awareness or active collaboration. Neither is a great look.

Viruses insert RNA (or DNA, depending on the virus) into the cells they infect, and use your cells’ own machinery to replicate themselves, including portions of their capsids like spike proteins.

That’s… also what the mRNA vaccines do. The poster above is right. Whether it’s the vaccine or the virus, they’re both hijacking your cells’ to produce “body parts” of the virus.