On the one hand, killing ISIS rebels is good actually.
On the other hand, anything NATO has in store for Syria is worse than anything a Syrian head of state could imagine.
Hey remember when NATO bombed a chemical plants (with, presumably, dangerous chemicals inside as well as civilians) in retaliation for a “chemical attack” they, 1 year later, admitted had no evidence (which Russia and Syria had been saying since day one)?
Remember when they killed Gaddafi and now there are open-air slave markets? Why would you want that for Syria?
On the one hand, killing ISIS rebels is good actually.
On the other hand, anything NATO has in store for Syria is worse than anything a Syrian head of state could imagine.
Hey remember when NATO bombed a chemical plants (with, presumably, dangerous chemicals inside as well as civilians) in retaliation for a “chemical attack” they, 1 year later, admitted had no evidence (which Russia and Syria had been saying since day one)?
Remember when they killed Gaddafi and now there are open-air slave markets? Why would you want that for Syria?