The Internet Systems Consortium has stopped maintaining their DHCP client, which is standard on a lot of distros.
Debian has updated its documentation and now warns users to choose an alternative:

https://packages.debian.org/bookworm/isc-dhcp-client

On Debian Unstable, I was already forced to uninstall it in yesterday’s upgrade.
If you’re using network-manager, you don’t need to worry, since it includes its own dhcp client, but for others, this might be relevant.

On Arch, this concerns the dhcpd package:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Dhcpd

  • Laser@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    From my point of view, nothing else but NetworkManager makes sense to ship by default for a distribution aimed at desktop use. So I fully understand distributions doing this. My point was rather that this is not related to any particular WM / DE.

    • kixik
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think so. Dhcpcd + wpa_supplicant is really light, suitable for light installers, and live USB stick images.

      I’ve been using dhcpcd + wpa_supplicant for so long… I do understand currently users prefer NM, but I hope there’s no push for it to be the unique way to manage network connectivity, and on light installers, I hope I’m not force to use NM either.

      • Laser@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean traditionally NetworkManager uses wpa_supplicant anyways though there is the option for iwd. So it will stay available for quite some time.