• @frippa
      link
      111 year ago

      Nukes are the reason North Korea wasn’t invaded a second time (that and their close ties with China, a country with nukes)

        • @redtea@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          81 year ago

          Except that part of Korea is still occupied and the US have continuously goaded the DPRK since the Korean war. Whereas in Europe, the Soviets more-or-less, and albeit (we now know) temporarily, disarmed the Nazis. The US is free to leave at any time and let the Koreans make peace between themselves.

          Additionally, during the relevant period in Europe: there have been ‘two’ major internal wars, one of which is ongoing, plus a cold war; North Western Europe economically punished Eastern Europe, Southern Europe, and Ireland, leading to uncountable suffering; and the Europeans slaughtered hundreds of thousands of people in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya, to name just a few atrocities. If there’s an analogy, it’s not between Germany and France, it’s between the UK and any number of the places it’s remorselessly destroyed since WWII.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
      link
      111 year ago

      Maybe US should lead by example and start getting rid of their nukes then. Last I checked US pulled out the treaties that were there instead.

    • @TheAnonymouseJoker
      link
      61 year ago

      I agree, which is why we should start with USA disarmament and them being trialled as a whole in Nuremberg style trials held by the world.

        • @TheAnonymouseJoker
          link
          11 year ago

          Then let China, Russia, North Korea and other countries commit atleast the same number of genocides and foreign regime changes as USA and UK have done. Only then do you have the right to speak about concepts like nuclear proliferation being bad.

          North Korea was bombed by USA, and the next time it was not bombed and genocided is because of nukes.