Oh, it was. And it was not just one platform, it was several ones.
Do you think that it’s okay to have terms of service? Or do you think that I have the right to post cat content every day on your train forum?
Okay, that’s established. Now is it okay for several social media platforms to ban someone that violates their terms of service?
I agree that their reach is immense but social media isn’t needed to live. Even a supermarket wouldn’t be responsible to let someone in that’s wildly misbehaving, even if that person was very hungry (which would make their need to go there more important than otherwise).
I would totally be fine with legislation to force monopoly social media like fb and insta to implement interoperability, so you can participate from different platforms.
Do you think that it’s okay to have terms of service? Or do you think that I have the right to post cat content every day on your train forum?
Okay, that’s established. Now is it okay for several social media platforms to ban someone that violates their terms of service?
I agree that their reach is immense but social media isn’t needed to live. Even a supermarket wouldn’t be responsible to let someone in that’s wildly misbehaving, even if that person was very hungry (which would make their need to go there more important than otherwise).
I would totally be fine with legislation to force monopoly social media like fb and insta to implement interoperability, so you can participate from different platforms.
It is okay. It is not okay to ban someone who violates this ToS and not to ban other (who also violates the) ToS.
If my train forum was a huge social network not only about trains — ok.