Israeli military spokesman Daniel Hagari said in a briefing early Wednesday morning that no Israeli strike, either by air, land or sea, occurred near Al-Ahli Arab Hospital at the time of the deadly explosion. He added that drone footage, radar information and a recording of Gaza militants indicate a misfired Islamic Jihad rocket was responsible.

He said the Israeli military would soon publish the radar info, footage and a recording of militants in Gaza assigning blame to Islamic Jihad, a group aligned with Hamas. All the information, Hagari said, would be given to President Biden as part of a “full briefing” when the U.S. leader arrives in Israel Wednesday.

Palestinian Ambassador to the U.N. Riyad Mansour accused Israel of carrying out the strike, calling Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu a liar for blaming the strike on the armed group Islamic Jihad. “Now they change the story to try to blame the Palestinians. It is a lie,” Mansour said during a press conference at the U.N. headquarters.

Edit: From the IDF’s official Telegram Channel

Post 1:

IDF: A failed rocket launch by the Islamic Jihad terrorist organization hit the Al Ahli hospital in Gaza City

Attached is a video from the IAF system that captured the area around the hospital before and after the failed rocket launch by the Islamic Jihad terrorist organization: https://bit.ly/3M5oQMI

Post 2:

IDF: Following the briefing by the IDF Spokesperson Rear Admiral Daniel Hagari on the failed rocket launch by the Islamic Jihad terrorist organization that hit the hospital in Gaza City:

Attached is the briefing: https://IDFANC.activetrail.biz/ANC1810202362

Attached is a recording of a conversation between Hamas operatives regarding the Islamic Jihad failed rocket launch on the hospital on October 17, 2023: https://bit.ly/3S4xqiG

Attached is a visual analysis following the IAF’s examination on the subject: https://IDFANC.activetrail.biz/ANC1810156854

Attached is an infographic of all the failed rocket launches in the Gaza Strip since the beginning of the war: https://IDFANC.activetrail.biz/1810202309876543672

Attached is a photograph from the IDF launch identification system on the subject: https://IDFANC.activetrail.biz/ANC18102023984

Post 3:

Following the recording that was sent out, attached is a transcript of the conversation between Hamas operatives: https://IDFANC.activetrail.biz/ANC181020238465

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why are we talking and not doing? Just release it already if it’s vindicating.

  • thoro
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ok great. Do it.

  • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d be very interested to see their evidence, especially given the initial claim that they hit the hospital because HAMAS were there. The video that I saw shows a fuck off huge explosion, and I’d be very surprised to learn that a Jihadist group’s rocket did that. AFAIK, most of their rockets are anti-personnel and anti-armor grade, stuff a little like what the HIMARS carries, not shit that’s going to level half a hospital in one go. I mean, unless they’re just casually rocking Tomahawk cruise missiles or something, it just seems like a big reach.

    • ∟⊔⊤∦∣≶@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do you have a source for this initial claim? The only one I have seen is a random tweet by a wannabe Israel fanatic influencer, and not at all an official statement.

      • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        37
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Not on hand, heard it from an irl friend who’s also following the situation. He said that Israel claimed that it met a tactical objective.

        Edit: I realize I should have fact checked him, but the horrible Nancy Grace truth is that I didn’t.

        • PupBiru@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          probably best not to say “given their initial claim” given that the source is a friend who didn’t say where they’d seen the info

          so you may have misinterpreted what they were saying (someone claimed rather than reliable israeli sources claim), they could have misinterpreted what the source was saying, the source could have been exactly like this post and subject to similar accidental misinterpretation, or it could be just straight up misinformation: either accidental or intentional

          given the amount of misinformation swirling about the whole situation, i’d probably go with “i had heard” or “i think someone mentioned somewhere” etc

    • PvtGetSum@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Other than things that could be explosive in a hospital normally (O2 canisters), Hamas has been known to use hospitals to store munitions and launch rocket strikes in the past. While I’m not saying “Israel definitely didn’t do it” I don’t think it’s out of the question or even unlikely that it genuinely wasn’t an Israeli strike

      • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        O2 doesn’t explode. I’ve done 13 years in EMS, handled the stuff daily, tried it. O2 doesn’t and wouldn’t explode like that. Concentrated O2 WILL make a fire burn MUCH more aggressively, but not explode.

            • ∟⊔⊤∦∣≶@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              That under normal conditions o2 won’t explode, it will just make intense fire. It’s a bit hard to find info on if it explodes if a rocket hits it.

              Regardless, the crater shows the rocket didn’t hit the hospital anyway.

              • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                I’m telling you, it shouldn’t explode even if a rocket hits it. You can get pure O2 as hot as you like and it won’t burn; kick it, shock it, pressurize it, stick it in a stew, it won’t burn. Oxygen is a necessary part of combustion, but O2 itself does not combust; it has to have something to chemically interact with, like Hydrogen or Carbon. A lot of your explosives are things that already have oxygen built in to the molecule, IIRC, and can therefore release all of its energy all at once, where materials like Gasoline (and a lot of rocket fuels that I’m aware of) that don’t have built-in oxygen will only burn as fast as oxygen can get to the molecules.

                Maybe you’re thinking of something like a BLEVE, which I suppose something similar is possible if there was a bunch of rocket fuel that functionally got vaporized on impact to make a fuel-air mix, but I don’t think that’s typically how it goes with rocket impacts.

                Anyway, yes, the crater seems to be in a parking lot, so that’s that.

      • zerfuffle
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There would be secondary detonations if that was the case. We’ve literally spent the past two years seeing ammunition depot explosions in Ukraine, so even armchair analysts on Lemmy should know what they look like.

      • ∟⊔⊤∦∣≶@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Of course, both possibilities exist. With the information we have currently, it’s not possible to definitively say either way.

        The other possibility being it was Israel but was a mistake.

    • Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      There was also a video clip I saw that starts with a chain link fence and then you hear a sort of whistling sound and something slams down hard with a pretty big explosion. Ofc I’m not sure it’s verified or not but sounded and looked more like the impact of something like a JDAM instead of what you’d expect from the rockets fired by Hamas/Islamic jihad. Which although I understand are deadly, especially in large numbers, I don’t think have the explosive charge anywhere close to the impact in the video (which also seems immediate and not a bunch of secondary explosions.)

  • Silverseren@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would like to see this evidence. The flipping of stories from Israeli spokespeople right after the event to now is bizarre. There were a number of people, even initial US government responses, saying that the hospital was a Hamas hideout, so Israel blew it up on purpose and it’s a good thing.

    Also, why do they just so happen to have audio recordings of this specific terrorist group talking about this event in particular within an hour or so after the event? Is that a likely thing for them to have acquired?

    • JoeHill@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If you don’t trust the Israeli government, the whole thing was live-streamed. https://nitter.net/COUPSURE/status/1714380403782324249

      That footage was subsequently rebroadcast on Al-Jazeera.

      There’s a number of other angles you can find on the birdsite too.

      And yes, if someone was talking about it on a radio, I’d expect Israeli sigint to pick it up. This is not their first rodeo. They’ve been the occupying power in Gaza for 56 years. That’s what made the Hamas massacre so shocking: how on earth did they miss the planning for two years.

      • Silverseren@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s the video where the timestamp doesn’t match up with the hospital event. It’s 30-ish minutes off for some confusing reason.

        Not to be confused with the other video being used for a while on official Israeli government accounts that got deleted when people figured out it was from 2022.

        • JoeHill@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          Speaking from my own experience running local cameras, timestamps aren’t always accurate due to admin misconfig or admin laziness

          But if we’re going to say that’s not the right footage, why is Al-Jazeera broadcasting it? To me, it doesn’t seem to square with their narrative, so why show it to their viewers at all?

          • Silverseren@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            21
            ·
            1 year ago

            It was just a livestream on Al Jazeera. It was running constantly. Hence why timestamps being off doesn’t make much sense.

      • Amaltheamannen
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        You really think shrapnel from a already disabled rocket could cause such a large explosion? Palestinians do not have western high explosives.

      • PupBiru@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        honestly outside of israel and palestine it’s worrisome that anyone considers either side their team

        its a super complex situation and both sides are fucking monstrous, but inside either country it becomes real simple: the other side legitimately might end specifically my life through nothing but random misfortune

        outside of that, i don’t see how anyone can think there’s 1 side that’s in the right

  • figaro@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Oof. Ngl the recording is pretty telling. But it is just secondhand evidence.

    The evidence presented from the recording is: someone said the shrapnel is from a Palestinian rocket." Not, “here are images of the shrapnel, which could only come from Palestinian rockets.”

    I haven’t looked at the other evidence though. It could be that this, combined with the rest of the evidence, paints a more complete picture.

    • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      This is what I was thinking of looking for. I know in the Ukraine conflict, they typically show rocket debris when going over incidents with rockets, so I was hoping to see some of the supposed debris here.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    @DolphinMath@slrpnk.net It looks like the copy/pasta here might run afoul of the rules regarding copyright.

    Consider editing it down to make it more concise and be guaranteed to be fair use. The topic is important and I don’t want to just remove it wholesale to eliminate copyright risk.

    👶 🛁 🌊

  • zerfuffle
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The sound of the munition used in the strike and the size of the explosion is in line with JDAMs used in prior conflicts, not that of a misfired missile: https://x.com/wyattreed13/status/1714338974544625692?s=20

    Feel free to compare with the use of other JDAMs: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A\_uwzugvv-g

    Palestine has recorded MANPADS capability and has demonstrated that capability in the past. IMO the “failed missile” shown looks a lot like a MANPADS in normal operation (primary phase, secondary acceleration phase, detonation phase).

      • zerfuffle
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Sound is usually caused by the various control surfaces… Which is what the JDAM introduces.

        Here’s evidence of an Israeli jet launching flares in a trajectory intersecting with the hospital: https://streamable.com/hchxwx

        It’s also evidence that Hamas rockets weren’t even close.

        • DolphinMath@slrpnk.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          You have a source for the sound claim? Weapons experts seem to disagree with that.

          Also, do you have the original source for that steamable link? A random video is pretty hard to verify one way or the other. Context from the original source would be very appreciated.

          • zerfuffle
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Twitter “weapons experts” don’t know shit. Basically, if you dropped a big ass ball from the sky, it wouldn’t make much sound at all. Bombs are either equipped explicitly to make sound (as in German bombs circa WW2) or it’s implicit because of control surfaces distorting the air. This only happens at a high enough speed and the pitch and tone of the whistle depends on the control surfaces.

            It’s like second year physics lol. The whole point of the JDAM is to add control surfaces to a bomb, so obviously it’s not going to sound like a dumb bomb.

            • DolphinMath@slrpnk.netOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              I’m not talking about twitter “weapons experts.”

              https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-67144061

              “So far the findings are inconclusive. BBC Verify has shown the evidence to a number of weapons experts, some of whom say it is not consistent with what you would expect from a typical Israeli airstrike.

              J Andres Gannon, an assistant professor at Vanderbilt University, in the US, says the explosion appears to be small, meaning that the heat generated from the impact may have been caused by leftover rocket fuel rather than an explosion from a warhead.

              Justin Bronk, a senior research fellow at the Royal United Services Institute (Rusi) in the UK, agrees. While it is difficult to be sure at such an early stage, he says, the evidence looks like the explosion was caused by a failed rocket section hitting the car park and causing a fuel and propellant fire.

              Mr Gannon says it is not possible to determine from the footage whether the projectile struck its intended target.

              Several experts we spoke to were not willing to put forward a view on what happened.”

              • zerfuffle
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                Explain the casualty count then? The casualty count has been verified by MSF doctors on the ground in Gaza.

                • DolphinMath@slrpnk.netOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Firstly, I’ve not seen anyone from MSF verify that claim. If you have a source, I’d love to see it.

                  Secondly, it has been reported that the hospital courtyard was densely packed with roughly 600 people. Unspent fuel from a rocket can add a lot to the overall explosive potential.

    • DolphinMath@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      If you take The Electronic Intifada at face value, I really don’t know what to tell you. They are one of the most biased news outlets possible in this conflict. I’ve never one seen them once try to understand the Israeli perspective. It’s pure propaganda.

      Fore example, their headline for Hamas’ brutal attack on Irsaeli civilians was “Israel-Arab normalization has not eliminated the resistance.”

  • WidowsFavoriteSon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    73
    ·
    1 year ago

    This will get all the Hamas apologists screaming FAKE NEWS now, wont it. It’s a removed when reality won’t conform to your belief system. Just ask the MAGA crowd.

    • DolphinMath@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The IDF still needs to present receipts in my opinion, and I look forward to them doing so.

      Nuanced discussion and compassion seem to get lost in all the “righteous” anger surrounding this topic unfortunately.

      • Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is my stance as well. I support the Israeli government as much as I support Hamas, which is to say I do not support either whatsoever. However, if the IDF is able to back up this claim, I’m more inclined to agree with them on this one particular whodunnit

      • slaacaa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yet most people on lemmy seem to believe the claim of Hamas, without any proof, because it supports their hate of Israel. This is like the 10th highly upvoted article on the topic, with most comments not even questioning the claim.

        It is possible that Israel did it, yes, but we don’t know it yet. IDF and Hamas both killed enough civilians already in a confirmed way, maybe let’s focus our critique on that in the meantime.

        • naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The Israeli government claimed responsibility first on twitter then deleted the tweets. It makes the whole thing a lot more sus.

          The IDF has also previously bombed hospitals and at least 1 UN run school so it wouldn’t be out of character to do it.

          The Israeli government has also stated they consider Palestinian people less than human and intend to level the Gaza strip.

    • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      They (israel) dropped more bombs in 2 weeks than was set off in afghanistan in a year of american assault.

      Why do you think its more likely a jihad mistaken self attack?

        • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          I dont think its impossible, but israel is certainly more likely to be at fault.

          And theyve shown it fits their end goals just fine.

      • DolphinMath@slrpnk.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        25
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        A large number of “bombs” being “dropped” does not necessarily indicate indiscriminate killing of civilians. In fact, a large number likely indicates smaller munitions being used for more targeted strikes.

        • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          A number of explosives surpassing an american quantity of destructive force over a country restricted down to the size of gaza absolutely implies an increased odds of israel missing a target.

          Im not even attributing intent, despite israels eagerness to supply it. Im sure they didnt mean to hit the hospital. I would hope, at least, especially given how poorly its looked for them on the world stage.

          • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Not just a place the size of Gaza, but a place as densely populated as Gaza.

            There’s about 15,000 people per square mile.

        • Annoyed_🦀 @monyet.cc
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Emm, you do realise more than 3000 palestine civilian being killed since the israel invasion in respond to hamas invasion right?

          Right?

        • dannoffs@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          Have you seen the pictures of Gaza recently? Smaller targeted munitions don’t level entire blocks. You’re doing straight up genocide apologia.

          • DolphinMath@slrpnk.netOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I’m following it closely. The photos and videos I’ve seen and the interviews I’ve heard are absolutely horrific.

            I wouldn’t throw out the term genocide lightly, but my heart breaks for the innocents. War is literal hell.

            • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              I dont think anyone is using the term genocide lightly in reference to this massacre.

              I would even argue that genocide will have a shining, bloody example in history books for centuries to come thanks to israels actions.