I care about my privacy, though I like it’s UI. Is it really as bad as some say?

  • sir_reginald@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    because that effectively make them an advertising company.

    Advertising online is incompatible with privacy, there’s no reconciliation between the two. And whoever tells you otherwise, is an advertiser.

    • Dudewitbow
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Some people dont see it as a black and white issue.

      Does firefox lose its privacy status if it takes google money and makes the default search engine google search?

      • sir_reginald@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Definitely yes. Firefox is not private as provided by Mozilla. You have to use a custom user.js to disable all the tracking, or install a Firefox based browser like Librewolf or Mullvad Browser.

        • Dudewitbow
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hence not everyone sees it as a black and white thing, because there will be a lot of people who would disagree with your statement to some extent.

    • virtualbriefcase@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unfortunately there’s ads in Firefox too, and they’re opt out instead of opt in. I’m certainly not a fan of it, but outside of LibreWolf until servo becomes a thing I think should be right but we’re stuck choosing lesser of multiple evils.

      • sir_reginald@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        there’s a huge difference: Firefox does not inject ads on the pages you visit.

        Anyway, I recommend to use Librewolf or Mullvad Browser instead of Firefox.