• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Linked an article stating SBU was hit, linked an Ukrainian official showing the street where SBU is being hit. This troll continues to argue that SBU was not hit.

      Ladies and gentlemen, and everyone between. This is how it looks when it’s impossible to admit being wrong.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          You said it’s false and provided zero sources to substantiate that claim. Since you claim it’s false WHERE IS YOUR PROOF?

          Meanwhile, the second source very clearly provides indirect evidence for the claim. Nowhere does it contradict it. Again, utter lack of ability to do critical thinking is exactly what I’ve come to expect here.

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              2 years ago

              You’ve yet to provide any sources contradicting what I said. Hold yourself to the same standard you keep trying to hold others too. Where is your proof?

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  You’re fundamentally confused, that we can agree on. Your claim is that SBU offices were not hit. I ask for proof. So far any circumstantial evidence that exists points to these offices being hit. You claim they were not, give me proof.

                  Or is proof only required for things that contradict what you claim? 😂