You said it’s false and provided zero sources to substantiate that claim. Since you claim it’s false WHERE IS YOUR PROOF?
Meanwhile, the second source very clearly provides indirect evidence for the claim. Nowhere does it contradict it. Again, utter lack of ability to do critical thinking is exactly what I’ve come to expect here.
You’ve yet to provide any sources contradicting what I said. Hold yourself to the same standard you keep trying to hold others too. Where is your proof?
You’re fundamentally confused, that we can agree on. Your claim is that SBU offices were not hit. I ask for proof. So far any circumstantial evidence that exists points to these offices being hit. You claim they were not, give me proof.
Or is proof only required for things that contradict what you claim? 😂
deleted by creator
You said it’s false and provided zero sources to substantiate that claim. Since you claim it’s false WHERE IS YOUR PROOF?
Meanwhile, the second source very clearly provides indirect evidence for the claim. Nowhere does it contradict it. Again, utter lack of ability to do critical thinking is exactly what I’ve come to expect here.
deleted by creator
You’ve yet to provide any sources contradicting what I said. Hold yourself to the same standard you keep trying to hold others too. Where is your proof?
deleted by creator
You’re fundamentally confused, that we can agree on. Your claim is that SBU offices were not hit. I ask for proof. So far any circumstantial evidence that exists points to these offices being hit. You claim they were not, give me proof.
Or is proof only required for things that contradict what you claim? 😂
deleted by creator
Oh so if something isn’t on your favorite propaganda outlet then it didn’t happen, that sure is unassailable logic. 😂
deleted by creator