You’re fundamentally confused, that we can agree on. Your claim is that SBU offices were not hit. I ask for proof. So far any circumstantial evidence that exists points to these offices being hit. You claim they were not, give me proof.
Or is proof only required for things that contradict what you claim? 😂
Where is the proof that the explosion on the street did not hit SBU offices on that street which was reported in the source I linked. Where is the proof?
And what I actually said is that the news article I linked said the office was hit, while an official Ukrainian account collaborates that information indirectly by showing the explosion on the street where the office is. You continue to be stunningly bad at trolling. I guess NAFO gets the quality of work they pay for. 😂
You’re fundamentally confused, that we can agree on. Your claim is that SBU offices were not hit. I ask for proof. So far any circumstantial evidence that exists points to these offices being hit. You claim they were not, give me proof.
Or is proof only required for things that contradict what you claim? 😂
deleted by creator
Oh so if something isn’t on your favorite propaganda outlet then it didn’t happen, that sure is unassailable logic. 😂
deleted by creator
You have shown no evidence of me being wrong. I’m curious to see how far will you go before you can admit that.
deleted by creator
Where is the proof that the explosion on the street did not hit SBU offices on that street which was reported in the source I linked. Where is the proof?
deleted by creator
But it is being reported by the Russians https://www.rt.com/russia/564369-central-kiev-hit-missile-strikes-officials/?ysclid=l94g0drxyb929926457
And what I actually said is that the news article I linked said the office was hit, while an official Ukrainian account collaborates that information indirectly by showing the explosion on the street where the office is. You continue to be stunningly bad at trolling. I guess NAFO gets the quality of work they pay for. 😂