• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Where is the proof that the explosion on the street did not hit SBU offices on that street which was reported in the source I linked. Where is the proof?

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        But it is being reported by the Russians https://www.rt.com/russia/564369-central-kiev-hit-missile-strikes-officials/?ysclid=l94g0drxyb929926457

        And what I actually said is that the news article I linked said the office was hit, while an official Ukrainian account collaborates that information indirectly by showing the explosion on the street where the office is. You continue to be stunningly bad at trolling. I guess NAFO gets the quality of work they pay for. 😂

              • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                2 years ago

                I stated that you don’t hold yourself to the same level of proof that you require of others. The statement that SBU offices were hit has far more evidence to support it than the opposite. Yet, here you still are hours later not being able to admit this.

                You are free to admit being wrong, you know. It can be refreshing. Especially given that it’s obvious to everyone reading this thread. You’re not fooling anybody here.

                  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    2 years ago

                    I gave you sources, you never contradicted them. Two of the sources say that the SBU offices were hit, third source shows an explosion on the street the offices are located. I love how you’re still struggling with this. Why am I under the burden of providing even more evidence?