• Sh3Rm4n
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          None of the commentators who are trying to disregard your skepticism are known to be respectful.

          (at least in politically related discussions)

      • Slatlun
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        Where they stand on other comments? To put it in the most aggresive light- you were called out for inaccurate information. Even so, you must’ve recognized the original post was factually incorrect because you changed the post title. Why not just own it. It goes like this, ‘Oops, copied the title with the photo. I fixed it.’ No big deal. Of course, making a mistake, quietly trying to fix it, then pretending the person pointing it out is in the wrong is another way to go.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          2 years ago

          I updated the title since I couldn’t find collaborating information. I can’t verify it. However, that doesn’t change the fact that OP has a very clear agenda.

          • Slatlun
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            You posted something you didn’t verify then attacked/dismissed the person who pointed it out because of your bias coming in. Does that mean that they don’t also have an agenda? No. Does it help me to trust anything you post? Also no.

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              2 years ago

              Sure, we all have our biases. I’ve had lots of negative interactions with the person in question, and I don’t take anything they say to be in good faith. It is what it is.

          • Sh3Rm4n
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            2 years ago

            And you have a problem with them because of their agenda that they are calling out that you are posting stuff without any source / proof?

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              2 years ago

              No, I have a problem with them constantly spamming NATO propaganda. Literally the only thing this account does.

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  The issue is with the constant misinformation you continue to spread here while cheering on a path towards a nuclear holocaust.

    • Muad'Dibber@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      You can click on a user profile to view their history. Just because you’re ignorant of their posting history doesn’t mean anyone else is.