An often overlooked aspect of reducing one’s environmental footprint is having no children or having fewer children. It’s the only ethical form of population reduction for obvious reasons, and less people means that humanity’s collective environmental impact is reduced.

To my knowledge, China is the only country to have national legislation limiting the number of children people can have through its one-child policy, which has recently been changed to allow two children per family to reduce the risk of having a population where the elderly massively outnumber young people. Of course, this policy needs to be combined with sex education, easy access to contraception, etc in order to actually work.

What would your opinion be on other countries, especially other developed countries, adopting policies like this? Do you think the environmental benefits outweigh the issues caused?

  • Stoned_Ape
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 years ago

    Democracy doesn’t just apply to states or how elections are run: were that true, there would be no democratic workplaces.

    That’s what I meant with “in broader terms”. It would really be nice if you read my complete comments, and not just fragments of it.

    I have no clue why you keep on responding in this conversation or what your endgame is here.

    Maybe I just want to talk about this. I don’t need an “endgame”, nor do you. If you think I have an endgame or agenda, it’s no wonder that you misinterpret my comments like that.

    • koavf
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 years ago

      Well, I’m not interested in mindless chatter, so please stop responding to me on this topic. Have a nice day.