• @SloppilyFlossOP
      link
      64 years ago

      The thing you’ve got to keep in mind is this is very much first-gen tech. So it’s best not to compare this to any current gen phones or standards. Think of it as year 1 Android, minus being backed by huge companies. It’s honestly amazing we have this at all, and for free because of the hard work the community has put into the OSes!

      Even still, things are improving incredibly rapidly in the software department with things like CRUST, which is a battery and sleep optimization of sorts. So for how young the project is, and how truly complicated this really is, the current state of it is super impressive, along with the speed of its improvements. That’s why the review is marked as positive.

      If this doesn’t make you want to buy the phone, that’s totally cool! It’s a review so other people can know how the phone functions in its current state, not a piece of advertisement.

    • @SirLotsaLocks
      link
      44 years ago

      For the current market the pinephone is very cheap. Even cheap phones usually go around $200 new. Also people are lowering their expectations because they know this isn’t going to be good compared to even old android versions in terms of usability. This is a whole new world of mobile operating systems and as such it’s going to take a long time to get to be even close to usable for the general consumer.

  • @Psychemar
    link
    2
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    In terms of hardware I feel there needs to be a Pinephone V2. Even my ~6yo Samsung S4 has a 1080p screen and 32gb of internal storage.

    On the software front maybe someone can answer a question: what is the end goal of the linux OSes? Are we going to be able to use the apps that are available for Android for example? Without something like that it seems that adoption of alternative OSes might be low.

    • @SloppilyFlossOP
      link
      54 years ago

      I don’t really think there’s an end goal in mind for these projects, besides getting things like CRUST and Calls and Messaging figured out as soon as they can. They’re just trying to provide an alternative to typical phone OSes like Android and iOS while trying to provide a full Linux experience in your pocket.

      SailfishOS lets you run Android apps, and some of the other available OSes let you install Anbox so you can sort of run some apps. I think people shouldn’t go in just expecting to run Android apps. The point is to get away from the Android/iOS ecosystem and embrace a growing mobile Linux ecosystem.

    • @ajz
      link
      2
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      deleted by creator

  • @ster
    link
    14 years ago

    I would definitely say that the unresponsiveness is not a hardware issue. Plenty of android phones have absolutely crappy SoCs but still run pretty responsively for basic usage (maybe browsing the web would be slow with how bloated browsers have to be nowadays).