For me

Mint

Manjaro

Zorin

Garuda

Neon

    • pH3ra
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m gonna say “no”, but just by personal preference.
      I agree that, if you’re skilled enough, 90% of distributions out there are completely useless once Arch and Debian are available.

        • pH3ra
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Debian is great if you want a stable distro. If you want the latest software run… Debian + Flatpak

          • LeFantome@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Do you install ffmpeg via Flatpak?

            In the spirit of your comment though, I have been meaning to try Debian Stable with Distrobox / Arch.

          • fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’ve not used Gentoo in years but I really ought to give it another go. Do you still have to compile everything from scratch or are there binary repos now?

    • OrdinaryAlien@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’ve used Arch on many different computers over the years. It’s not stable, it breaks. I don’t understand why it’s great. Debian (minimal install) is better.

      • SaltyIceteaMaker
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve only had one problem with arch (it broke after an update once) except for that one problem it was always very stable and solid in my experience.

        Debian is too “old” for me. I prefer bleeding edge and i refuse to use any flatpaks or such because they are a pain in the ass to set up right in my experience