• Ricaz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      71
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, they should provide thousands of gigiabits of video streaming to everyone for free. It’s our right!

        • candybrie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          Most of what they use your data for is to serve you ads. If you’re blocking ads, that data isn’t all that valuable.

          • Contend6248@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            They still have valuable data, they collect how interesting something is, so you’re even contributing to the algorithm and you essentially advertise videos you’re watching to other users with similar interests on the platform. People without adblock will come plenty.

            That ad blocking on Youtube makes you a worthless user for anyone on there is just not true.

            I would consider disabling my ad-blocker on there and use official clients, but they are just going so far beyond anything i could take with how many ads i’m getting then. I see it as their fault not being able to find an acceptable amount.

        • Ricaz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Enthusiasts who want to earn money off the platform, yes.

          • Concetta@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ah yes, because humans never want to share information, or show others something they’ve achieved or created. The only possible motivation could be money.

            • Ricaz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s not what I’m saying, but these people choose to upload their content to YouTube specifically, so what’s your point?

              • Concetta@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                That’s there’s not really another platform to upload to that you can easily share long form video content on, for free? I don’t understand your point now.

                • Ricaz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  My point is that nothing is free. You can’t have it both ways.

                  • Concetta@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    What? My initial point was people wanted to share things like information or creativity and youtube is one of the only viable places to upload too. I literally don’t understand your points.

          • Fosheze@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes but they can’t anyways because google never fixed their completely borked content ID system. Half the people I watch just assume that all of their videos will be demonitized anyways. They make all of their money off of patreon.

            • Ricaz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m no Google fan, but it’s borderline impossible to moderate a site of that size. It’s a legal nightmare that cannot be solved by just humans. Read some articles about the human moderators of sites like YouTube and Facebook. Those people see some shit.

              But yes, YouTube should definitely improve their escalation system, and pay more attention to refuted strikes. It sucks to see innocent creators get punished by a broken system.

          • iegod@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            As a contributor who doesn’t monetize videos, you don’t speak for everyone.

      • monk@lemmy.unboiled.info
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Big platforms tend to forget they’re big because they’re free. It’s our duty to remind them.

        • Colforge@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You know they wouldn’t get paid if nobody watched the ads. And if they didn’t get paid they wouldn’t have any reason to pay to run the site. Explaining that a corporation will not run a site like YouTube for free (which it wouldn’t even be, it costs a lot of money to run) if they weren’t getting paid. Quit attacking other users simply for pointing out facts. It’s beneath you (I think)

            • Colforge@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I never said that Google is on the verge of collapse, nor did I defend them. I merely stated that Google is a corporation, driven by profit, and expecting Google to act in the interest of anything but their own profits is a fool’s fantasy. Quit putting words in people’s mouths. It’s unbecoming of anyone that wants to have a legitimate discussion and it’s just toxic.