I dont agree with many things apple does at all, and I also think their password manager has flaws like revealing usernames without authentification.

It is pretty handy though, to have a file where the entries are stored unencrypted, and if the password manager detects an entry it prompts to decrypt exactly that field, maybe with a fingerprint.

KeepassDX needs to run in the background and be completely unlocked to even detect apps or password fields.

Do you know any existing app that can do this?

    • Rootiest@lemm.eeEnglish
      51·
      11 个月前

      I think what they meant is that one option uses network connectivity while the other functions entirely offline

    • Devjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      2·
      11 个月前

      Which would make it hardly accessible outside of your home. Still not locally saved as well. And imho if he is not sure which password manager he should choose, he should maybe not self host just yet.

      • Ekpu@lemmy.world
        41·
        11 个月前

        Bitwarden keeps a local encrypted copy of the database and only connects to the server for synchronisation.

          • Oisteink@feddit.nl
            21·
            11 个月前

            Maybe because it seems you claim self-hosting bit warden is cloud only and that self-hosted is not accessible outside the house?
            Note: I do not recommending self-hosting bitwarden

            • Vexz@kbin.social
              2·
              11 个月前

              Note: I do not recommending self-hosting bitwarden

              Why not? I have my own instance running on my NAS and I love to have it self-hosted because this way I keep the passwords where I know nobody else can get them.

              • Oisteink@feddit.nl
                1·
                11 个月前

                Because a password manager is critical and if you ask me I’d say no. If you have the know how and understand the risk you won’t be asking

                • Vexz@kbin.social
                  1·
                  11 个月前

                  Well, I work in the IT so I know some stuff about security in the digital world. But these systems (password managers in general) are built to be secure and not just tell every password they store without some security measures. Yes, I know there can be security holes, bugs and so on. But that’s why these tools get thoroughly tested.
                  You always have to take risks in the world of computers. So what’s the point? Being as secure as possible? Then better not even bother with password managers at all because they all can have security holes.
                  It’s more about how much you trust a password manager and how much you trust yourself in how cautious you use it. The risk is always there.

                  • Oisteink@feddit.nl
                    1·
                    11 个月前

                    Ok. I’m quite the IT person myself, and I can say I’d not recommend you running your own either.