• mlc894@lemm.ee
    1732·
    1 年前

    This isn’t YouTube Premium; this is YouTube TV which is an entirely different product. YouTube Premium is like $13/mo. and cheaper for students.

      • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
        7·
        1 年前

        Couldn’t you just use an antenna?

        Because … O(ver) T(he) A(ir)?

        I’m near Detroit and pick up ~50 channels with a $20 antenna.

        • InvaderDJ@lemmy.worldEnglish
          4·
          1 年前

          This is the best way, but it doesn’t work in every scenario. At my last apartment, I was basically unable to get OTA channels. Too much of the sky was blocked, and I think radio interference from a nearby military base didn’t help.

          In my current condo it works mostly well, but I do get some skipping and drops that can be annoying during a long game.

          • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
            2·
            1 年前

            I get, over the air, in HD, free, with an antenna, the major networks and their subchannels, movie channels, retro channels, pbs, game show channels, scifi channels, comedy channels, local channels, etc. Free.

            But I don’t mind watching wheel of fortune.

            Anything I don’t get, I find a pirate stream for - which is usually found on one of 3 or 4 sites I use.

            • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
              2·
              1 年前

              I’m just messing with ya. We used to have an antenna and those shows were on all the time just because of our schedules

    • crusa187English
      43·
      1 年前

      Surely they’d let you pay more to keep from having to see those ads.

      • Dips@feddit.de
        12·
        1 年前

        Is this a normal price for TV in the US? In Europe it is more like 10-20€, which is why 50$ sounds out of this world ridiculous.

    • dirtbiker509@lemm.ee
      201·
      1 年前

      If there were no ads at all I’d instantly subscribe. But I don’t pay for anything that has ads. It’s either free with ads, or paid with no ads.

  • ikiru
    222·
    1 年前

    I can’t believe people still watch TV.

    • squidzorz@lemmy.world
      2·
      1 年前

      I think live sports is really the only reason most people pay for TV anymore. The rest of the content is available online on one of the 3,000 streaming platforms.

    • Default_Defect@midwest.socialEnglish
      2·
      1 年前

      Yup, my mom is trying to cut down on some bills but guess the one thing they can’t bring themselves to cut because they can’t imagine using anything else to watch their shows?

      • ikiru
        2·
        1 年前

        True, I can understand if people are elderly, sorry for assuming that if it’s not the case. But it seems like this promo is for a platform for streamed “cable TV”. In that case, people might as well just have streamed individual shows or movies if they don’t know how to torrent.

  • PrimalAnimist@lemmy.world
    131·
    1 年前

    I cancelled cable a few years ago and now use YouTube TV. I love it because I can record everything, never run out of DVR space. I can run 5 tvs with different shows on each. I can watch TV anywhere on my phone and laptop. I can stop on one device and pick back up on another. Well over 100 channels now (but I only really watch a handful). Every channel also has an on-demand section. Like TCM has what’s live but also a huge library to stream from.

    I have Hulu, Netflix, Amazon, Disney, Peacock, Max…but if I had to just use one service, it would be YouTube TV. It follows me, and is not tied to my house. If I go visit another state, it will even switch to the local news wherever I am. It has, by far, the most content in one spot for one price.

    • ronalicious@lemmy.worldEnglish
      5·
      1 年前

      thing that got me w/ YTV, and got it ultimately canceled was trying to share it w/ a family in another state. that doesn’t fly, which was a huge bummer.

      • greendakota99@lemmy.worldEnglish
        5·
        1 年前

        Was this a few years ago? This is no longer true.

        The past 3 years, I have shared the service with 3 friends, one of which lives in a different state and we have had no issues. You just add them to your Google Account as “family” and they login their own devices.

        There is some weirdness where YouTubeTV gives you 5 family shares, but only 3 total streams (outside your home’s WIFI) can be active at once. That’s why I limited the sharing to 3 total.

        You should give it another try!

        • PsychedSy@lemmy.world
          2·
          1 年前

          I randomly swap family members and friends out sometimes, too. It’s pretty sweet being able to share all of my apps, books, games and yt.

    • Bongles@lemm.ee
      4·
      1 年前

      I used it when it was new for a little while. I liked it as far as a TV service goes but I’m kind of over live shows at this point.

    • variants@possumpat.ioEnglish
      4·
      1 年前

      Holy cow how much do you spend on media a month, I’m over here thinking the $20 usenet I paid for the year was too much, but was debating on getting sling tv for the parents, right now I have an antenna connected to my plex server but it’s not the easiest to use

      • PrimalAnimist@lemmy.world
        5·
        1 年前

        Well I think I pay something like $95 for YouTube TV +Max. Netflix is like 12? I’m on a sweet Spotify+Hulu for 9.99 promo for years, but I think it’s going up to $10.99. Disney is like $9. It may seem like a lot, but that’s all I spend on entertainment. I don’t eat outside the home regularly. I don’t go see movies at theaters. I don’t buy things like DVDs and stuff.

        And to be fair, it’s for the household. We’re poly so there’s a variety of interests. And if you divide that by 5 adults, it’s cheap.

  • boonhet@lemm.ee
    6·
    1 年前

    I’d honestly rather pay the 6 euros for IPTV at that point (it’s only that cheap because our Internet is 3x more expensive than neighboring countries so they let you have cheap IPTV as an extra).

  • thecoolowl@lemmy.one
    52·
    1 年前

    I use YouTube the most of all streaming services. Yet I don’t understand why there isn’t an affordable easy to use option, that includes no ads and a high CPM for creators.

    My understanding is YouTube premium, doesn’t highten the payout to creators, but rather just substitutes the dirt poor ad revenue per impression.

    • iAmTheTot@kbin.social
      15·
      1 年前

      You’re misinformed. I watch many creators who have said in their own words that Premium subscriber views make more money for them.

      • Fosheze@lemmy.worldEnglish
        22·
        1 年前

        All of the creators I watch say don’t bother because they just get demonitized from both and the money just winds up going to copyright trolls anyways.

    • shanghaibebop@beehaw.orgEnglish
      12·
      1 年前

      It actually does get higher revenue for content creators for the majority of your creators. Average per view is something like 5-10x vs non premium views.

      It’s based around your watch time and something like 50%? of your subscription split across the channels you watch.

      Ad impressions pay very little on YouTube.

    • d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz
      1·
      1 年前

      Doesn’t work for me. Pretty much every link either says “This feature is coming soon. We’re currently working on it! Thanks for your patience.”, or it says that it’s not available in my country. :/

      • Zerush
        2·
        1 年前

        Fucking country restrictions because of some idiotic copyrights.

      • Zerush
        2·
        1 年前

        This opens more than only Pluto, there I watch f.Exmpl also Euronews, BBC, NASA live and a lot of others, well, among these also Pluto, anyway better than YT TV. apart of free.

  • shiveyarbles@beehaw.orgEnglish
    1·
    1 年前

    Gawd yeah I get Hulu Live, and it costs $80+ a month… the video constantly drops or the image becomes static. And I’ve never been bombarded with more jardiance musicals and balance of nature ads in my life. It’s just non stop stuff I will never ever buy.