Been using SearXNG for about a year now, and I just can’t deal with instances constantly getting blocked by search engines anymore. So I’d like to find something a bit more reliable. I’ve read that DuckDuckGo has had some controversies in the past, and I wouldn’t touch Brave with a 39 and a half foot pole.

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Kagi is the best search engine on the web right now.

    They charge for it because they need to get money some other way then selling your data. But it’s well worth it.

    We have to stop expecting things to be free. They can’t be free if you want privacy and quality and no ads.

    • Bipta@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve seen it mentioned and you’re quite right about expecting to get quality, privacy, and free. It’s always a pick two.

      But can you explain why Kagi is so good?

      • exu@feditown.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Also a Kagi user here. First thing you’ll notice compared to other search engines is no ads at the top.
        Comparing between multiple search engines, Kagi consistently delivers relevant results for world wide content, but also for more local searches.
        You can further refine your search by up/down ranking sites for yourself or even create customized lenses that search specific (types of) sites if you know where you might find the answer. There are multiple predefined lenses, for example searching only .edu domains, forums or programming language websites.

      • 1984@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I could but you should just try it and see what you think. You can search 100 times for free to check it out.

        If you find what you are looking for and even getting new good results you never saw on Google, that’s a very good rating. :)

  • PenguinCoder@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Definitely give Kagi a try. Reliable, pretty accurate and privacy respecting. For that though you’ll need to actually pay for the service.

    • Bipta@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Can you explain what’s so good about it compared to Google besides the privacy aspect? I hear it’s “better” a lot.

    • foo@withachanceof.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      +1 for Kagi. I finally decided to drop Google after their bullshit WEI proposal with Chrome recently and it has been great so far. Yes, Kagi is paid, but we all know the saying that “if you’re not paying for it, you are the product.” That’s not the case with Kagi.

    • Lettuce eat lettuce
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m pretty sure DDG said they were censoring certain results that were misinformation related to Covid stuff.

      Some people flipped out because ddg said they were removing results for what they deemed as conspiracy theories about Covid, at least that’s what I heard.

      • CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah but… That was like 10 very loud idiots. There was a time where “news sites” spammed covid misinformation and they where right to block it.

        • Lettuce eat lettuce
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Very true. Yeah I’m not saying I disagre with their choice, I just couldn’t remember akk the exact details of the drama.

          Some folks want zero “tampering” with search results. But honestly, a y search engine by definition is already curating the results before they ever get to the end user. The algos and crawler indexing they do, on top of all the ranking choices for relevance and organization is all effecting what comes back from a search.

    • VolunTerry@monero.town
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The Microsoft trackers issue is bad and they eventually had to address it due to the backlash, but that’s not the only issue.

      They also began explicitly censoring search results and information. Regardless of any given persons stance on any particular issue, things like censoring or downranking particular results or labeling content mis, dis or mal information means an entity like DDG is acting as an arbiter of truth and limiting the information users have access to rather than acting as a tool for users to utilize in searching for info and presenting any and all viewpoints, allowing the user to make up their own mind.

      https://reclaimthenet.org/duckduckgo-down-ranking-russian-disinformation

      • CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        DDG does not index .onion websites, is it censorship?

        And downranking search engine optimized Covid and Russia desinformation is part of being a useful search engine. If you search for “Ukraine” and the first 20 results are obviously Kremlin propaganda, your search engine is trash and nobody will use it because the results are unreliable at best.

        The tracker issue had and has nothing to do with the search engine, just with the app. Yes that wasn’t a good thing but rather insignificant.

        • VolunTerry@monero.town
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’ll decide what is misinformation or propaganda for myself. If someone else is limiting what information you can and cannot have or determining what is objectively true for you before you even have exposure to other ideas, everything you “know” is unreliable at best.

    • Gush
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Man that website was so useful, thank you for linking it

  • Im28xwa@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Between the ones I tried startpage, DDG, and Brave the 1st one gives me the best results, all of them are privacy respecting

  • jrandiny@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Mullvad Leta is a good option but it’s not convenient because you need to be connected to their VPN

  • frap129@lemmy.maples.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I selfhost SearXNG and route it’s traffic through a VPN. I rarely get blocked by search engines, and when I do I just change the VPN server. You lose the benefit of your data being intermixed with everyone elses on a shared instance, but you still get the other privacy improvements from SearXNG

  • U de Recife@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Search (pun) for a SearxNG (read as searching) instance.

    It’s an open source meta search engine. You can make it even more private if you selfhost it.

    • nutbutter@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      OP said they want to stop using SearxNG.

      Also, selfhosting it makesist less privacy friendly, if you are hosting it only for yourself, as the search engines your instance is contacting can easily determine that all those searches are coming from a same IP. Sp, even if it is preventing the telemetry collection, a detailed profile can be made on the person hosting it. Butiff multiple people are using it, profiling becomes difficult. Same is the case with using self-hosted VPNs. They are good against censorship and for some other things, but not for privacy.

      • U de Recife@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh, thank you for correcting me! It’s right there and I didn’t see it. My bad.

        You raise good points. I confess I hadn’t thought about it like that. So, not only you corrected me, you also enlightened me. I’m today’s lucky 10000!

        Saying 'what kind of an idiot doesn't know about the Yellowstone supervolcano'; is so much more boring than telling someone about the Yellowstone supervolcano for the first time.