This article seems fishy to me, says it is too restrictive but it is a non-binding thing and when pressed America says it is about free speech? Yeeeeaaah nooooo.
And in the end the article says that the problem doesn’t lie with the proposal itself, but that Russia is the one who started it? As s PR stunt? Even though the majority of the world agrees on this? Wtf who wrote this crap?
“Muh free speech” isn’t a good excuse to say Nazism shouldn’t be combatted, in fact, no excuse is. No one should give two shits whether fascists have “freedom of speech”. You give them an inch, they take a mile.
For the people who want to actually know why instead of making random assumptions https://www.voanews.com/a/critics-say-un-resolution-on-nazism-too-restrictive/2534525.html
This article seems fishy to me, says it is too restrictive but it is a non-binding thing and when pressed America says it is about free speech? Yeeeeaaah nooooo.
And in the end the article says that the problem doesn’t lie with the proposal itself, but that Russia is the one who started it? As s PR stunt? Even though the majority of the world agrees on this? Wtf who wrote this crap?
I mean they are direct quotes, you can look up other articles to check.
ah no I was not doubting any sources, just this article is heavily biased towards the U.S. and is written like it belongs in the yellow papers
Amerika pretending like they have freedom of speech, as usual
Isn’t Voice of America a CIA front?
Radio Free and VoA. No doubt about that
“everything I don’t agree with is just the CIA in disguise”
“Russian bot” whataboutism won’t work here!
<marquee scrollamount=“5”><div style=“color: red;”>Better Luck Next Time!</div>
what
“Muh free speech” isn’t a good excuse to say Nazism shouldn’t be combatted, in fact, no excuse is. No one should give two shits whether fascists have “freedom of speech”. You give them an inch, they take a mile.