• eyes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Always love seeing these come up and everyone confidently stating that it’s been solved. Everything from a knitting tool (highly unlikely as the Romans didn’t knit) to a dice. The truth is we just don’t know and likely never will unless a new source .

    Personally I’m convinced by the theory that they’re probably a metalworkers portfolio piece used to demonstrate the creators skill, either to potential customers or as a test to join a guild.

  • Samsy
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 days ago

    Haha, they don’t know how to use the three dodecahedron’s.

      • alcibiades@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Ehh idk about this take. I agree with the article that there are some commercial historical mediums like the History Channel that interpret the past in an absurd/almost malicious way. However modern archaeology does a really good job of finding out how objects from the past were used and how people interacted with their environment. A toilet is not really gonna be up for debate as for what its use was. Historical text, fecal remains, toilets looking pretty similar for the past thousand years, is gonna tell you it’s a toilet.

        The notion of our interpretation of the past being completely flawed is kinda true if it was like the 1950s and we were talking about non-western cultures from a western perspective.

          • alcibiades@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            ion know why you saying “again” like you made a big point of it being a children’s book (you didn’t). I’m just saying I don’t like media like this. It feels like they’re delegitimizing research that is already brushed off by society as not useful compared to something in a stem field.

            We can have different opinions lol

            • MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              It’s fiction? I think you need to take a second to actually read the link provided because it’s very clear this is for children and your response to it is silly.

              • alcibiades@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Broski no need to get so pressed. What do you think fiction is? How would a young, impressionable audience, interpret this work?

                Works of fiction don’t exist in a vacuum. They are directly inspired and informed from the world we live in. In a similar vain, the impact of fiction does not exist in a vacuum. You don’t read a book and come away with no thoughts related to it. You don’t just throw away knowledge like that. If anything fiction works directed at children have an outsized impact on how we perceive the world compared to the space they occupy in literature.

                • MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Im not your bro. You literally are complaining about a fiction book that most people read at the age of nine to twelve. It’s not having the impact that you think it does. You are worrying about nothing likely because you don’t have kids.

                  I read a book at the same age that suggested we could live on Mars and there was a whole culture on the planet yet I don’t believe that either. Is that because at 9 I understood what fiction is?

      • The Octonaut@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 days ago

        I can’t remember if it’s an official Asimov book or not, but one of the Foundation books set far beyond even the main series has an archaeological mission finding thousands of ceremonial hard white ceramic bowl-funnels and speculating on their significance to these incomprehensibly ancient peoples.

        • Amon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          thousands

          There’s probably millions even if you account for the fact that most would have been destroyed

      • dalekcaan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        I remember reading a book as a kid, I can’t remember if it was this or maybe inspired by this, but adapted for kids (iirc the art style was more cartoony and comedic) where archeologists unearth a motel called the Toot and C’mon.

        Edit: after a bit of searching I think it was this book. Unlocked some memories I didn’t realize I had.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I just assume it’s a random doodad. Like a desk decoration or something. Why wouldn’t ancient people have had dumb bullshit that served no purpose other than it’s aesthetic value just like we do now?

    • Stamets@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      This isn’t even a joke, I have an O5 ID card in my wallet. Fun little thing to pull out in moments like this lol

        • Stamets@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 days ago

          God this thing has gotten so beaten up lately. Clearly not the best quality lol that or I’m the longest serving O5.

            • Stamets@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              There was a dude at a store a few months back who was wearing a hoodie with the Foundation logo on it. After making the purchase when putting the card away I saw the ID and pulled it out. Said “Keep up the good work and we’ll see about those incentives.” I’ve never seen a person look both confused and ecstatic at the same time before lol

  • alcoholicorn
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Archeologists after looking at literally anything: Looks like a calendar. Or maybe a religious object. Or maybe a calendar of religions significance.

  • Slovene@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    What if it’s a die for an ancient version of D&D? Labyrinths & Minotaurs. Or that thing you put treats in and then your dog rolls it around and gets a biccy every so often.

    • Pope-King Joe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      This is why I couldn’t have a time machine. I’d go back in time and fuck with people. Leave a modern day Bic pen deep in a cave in New Zealand, or a randomly shaped object with no clear use made from something like titanium in a forest in the middle of Brazil.

    • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      People say this every time, and it’s still not true, because the Romans didn’t knit. Knitting is a technology and it hadn’t made it to Rome at the time these were made.

      Also, some were solid and unsuitable for knitting. And they were found with giant piles of money, which is a weird place to keep your domestic tools.

    • andros_rex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      Knitting is a medieval development that originated around Egypt in probably 1000-1100 CE (AD). There is no evidence of two needle knitting before then.

      Romans used sprang, weaving and needlebinding techniques. They did not knit. Some needlebound artifacts can resemble knitting - particularly those in the Coptic stitch. They are still produced using the thumb and needle method of needlebinding and are structurally different.

      The type of knitting that YouTube grandma did on the dodecahedron - spool knitting/French knitting - is an even later development - early modern period - 1400-1500s.

      As a spool knitter, the dodecahedron makes very little sense. The spacing of the pegs - not the spacing of the holes - is what determines the size of the created tube. Every face of the dodecahedron would create the same size tube - which means you’ve just got extra random pointless shit digging into your hands. Google and compare to a modern spool knitter.

      The idea of making a doohickey for fingered gloves, which you would then need to sew on anyway (every knitters least favorite thing to do) - it’s silly.

      Here are some 4th/5th century socks - produced via needlebinding.

      Here is the earliest known example of true knitting. 1000 at earliest.

      You mentioned that not all socks would survive - that is true, but often textile patterns can be recovered through indentions in other material.

      • samus12345@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 days ago

        And they don’t show signs of wear and tear that using them for such a purpose would create, either.

      • Artyom@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Gloves. There’s several YouTube videos of people knitting gloves with them. If you use 5 holes, you’ll end up with a slight curve to one side for free. You can use the hole-sizes as a guide for finger width. Most of the work is done by the nubs sticking out, which hold the outermost stitch.

        • andros_rex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          YouTube grandma was using it as a French/spool knitter. You can do this with four nails in a board if you are really inclined. The problem is that the peg distance determines the size of the tube - not the holes. All faces would make the same size tube, which is just adding pointless bits to make it unpleasant to use (and more expensive/difficult to manufacture.)