Is meme

“During the cold war, the anticommunist ideological framework could transform any data about existing communist societies into hostile evidence. If the Soviets refused to negotiate a point, they were intransigent and belligerent; if they appeared willing to make concessions, this was but a skillful ploy to put us off our guard. By opposing arms limitations, they would have demonstrated their aggressive intent; but when in fact they supported most armament treaties, it was because they were mendacious and manipulative. If the churches in the USSR were empty, this demonstrated that religion was suppressed; but if the churches were full, this meant the people were rejecting the regime’s atheistic ideology. If the workers went on strike (as happened on infrequent occasions), this was evidence of their alienation from the collectivist system; if they didn’t go on strike, this was because they were intimidated and lacked freedom. A scarcity of consumer goods demonstrated the failure of the economic system; an improvement in consumer supplies meant only that the leaders were attempting to placate a restive population and so maintain a firmer hold over them.

"If communists in the United States played an important role struggling for the rights of workers, the poor, African-Americans, women, and others, this was only their guileful way of gathering support among disfranchised groups and gaining power for themselves. How one gained power by fighting for the rights of powerless groups was never explained. What we are dealing with is a nonfalsifiable orthodoxy, so assiduously marketed by the ruling interests that it affected people across the entire political spectrum.”

Lol, i don’t know if they’ve ever said that exactly, but they’ve definitely said things just as absurd in dozens of headlines and articles. This was just a riff on a common trope you will see in western media all the time when it comes to their China reporting. “But at what cost?” is a meme for a reason.

We’ve all seen it, China does something, good, bad, neutral, whatever, doesn’t really matter because the western media always find a way to spin it to fearmonger, demonize and denigrate China. On their environmental successes the usual western cope is either a simple “they’re lying, the CCP data is fabricated” or one of a thousand variations of “yeah but they’re just doing it to make money/gain global dominance”, or “yeah but what about this story about pollution in China from 10-20 years ago?”, or “yeah but they still pollute more than [insert country with a fraction of China’s population and/or industry]”, and so on.