• Grapho
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    I was saying that’s their reason, hence they didn’t provide any proof

    • DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      They were referencing the article above though? And you don’t disprove a statement by simply saying “nu-uh!” at them. Why do you think what they are saying is untrue?

      • Grapho
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Again, I’m not arguing against y’all. I’m arguing against the commenter saying the US is an almighty power that could snap its fingers and destroy China, which is pure cope devoid of any reasoning.

        • DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I wasn’t trying to argue with you, I was trying to get you to clarify your position though? Sorry if it came across as combative.

      • 201dberg@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        21 hours ago

        I think you have this copium comment mixed up comrade. I believe they are saying this lemmy.ee posters’ “America da best, China bad” comment is the cope. Not the article or the initial comment by the Lemmygrad user.

        The .ee commenter provides nothing other than random spouting of western propaganda nonsense in response to an article showing China’s strength. That is the cope.

        “What makes this claim fantasy” is cope. Cope is what makes it a fantasy. They are coping with the fact that China is beating them. So they beat their chest a scream about American being the best as a means to cope with the fact that China is beating them.

        • DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Well, they haven’t provided me with a response so I have no idea what they think about the situation. There’s no way they would do something silly and embarrassing like burst in here and show how little they understand about the topic though. No way they would do that.

          • 201dberg@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Yes they did. Multiple times now. You just decided to double down on misunderstanding their comment and attacking them. No offense, but you are the one in the wrong in this instance.

            • DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              I wasn’t attacking them, I was asking them to clarify their position. They refused to do so the entire time, hence all this confusion.

              • ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                13 minutes ago

                I was saying that’s their reason, hence they didn’t provide any proof

                They explained their position immediately after you asked for clarification, you are definitely attacking them.