• sith@lemmy.zipOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 day ago

        Or rather, Canada should invite some blue leaning states to join their far superior project.

        • Soggy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Marginally superior. They’ve got their own problems with right-wing politics, genocidal past and continued mistreatment of native peoples, foreign investors upending local economies, unsustainable extraction of natural resources, and they’re still connected to a heriditary monarchy for fucks sake. But they have better healthcare and safer cops.

  • slickgoat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    The traditional deal is you only get to threaten folk who haven’t access to nukes. If they have, your threat can be ignored. That’s why North Korea is a thing and Saddam Hussein isn’t.

    • Disaster@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      US global influence is already well into decline. This is the USA’s Byzantine period as we shift from a unipolar into an increasingly multipolar world.

    • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think he already has. The U.S. is still militarily influential of course, but no one…NO ONE…takes their political leaders as anything more than unhinged toddlers anymore.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Well to be fair, some leaders are seen as credible but everything is now predicated on the possibility that the guy elected in 4 years just decides to not honor anything. That used to be one of the hallmarks of the US, presidents honored the deals and such of previous presidents. So you’d know your deal would last or at least be renegotiated in good faith. Not so anymore.

  • 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Before 2022/2014 I wasn’t quite sure why they think they need European armed forces, now it’s obvious why they need it. (Would be good if the EU stays a voluntary confederation and not what the US is.)

    Two front hybrid warfare is not good for the EU.

    • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’ve always believed deeply that the European Union was a model for how we, as a species, have to evolve in order to reach that next step. Not in a Star Trek ideal of “one planet”, but at least in a “cooperation” that allows us to stop fighting each other.

      Hell…I’m even a believer IN a North American version of the same thing. Just not in the way that Trump is wanting it and NOT with Trump anywhere near the decision making process. A North American federation on good terms with the EU federation would be great as long as adults were in charge and sovereignty was respected rather an a man-child shouting out bullshit all the time.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        We could never have a North American Union. NAFTA was the first step and nationalists in the US and Mexico made it very clear they would commit violence if we dared so much as approach the EU model.

  • VeganPizza69 Ⓥ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    I would like to see more opinions from the Greenland locals, but I doubt that they want to exchange Denmark with the USA.

    • imerayuk@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      I would like to see more opinions from the Greenland locals, but I doubt that they want to exchange Denmark with the USA.

      I do know that they want to go independent and it seems as if a majority wants to be part of the European Union:

      According to a poll (auto-translated):

      40 years after Greenland left the EU, the mood is perhaps turning.

      In a survey conducted by Nasiffik – the Centre for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on Ilisimatusarfik – 60 percent of respondents say that they will vote ‘aap’ if a referendum was held on Greenlandic membership of the EU.

      • It is a surprising result that there is now a relatively large majority in the Greenlandic population who believe that Greenland should join the EU, says Rasmus Leander Nielsen, head of Nasiffik.

      […]

      https://knr.gl/da/nyheder/flertal-vil-have-groenland-tilbage-i-eu

    • sith@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      The population is so small that the US easily can give each individual a million dollar. And far less will probably be enough. So we can be certain that the locals will say yes if there is a vote.

  • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    I almost hope trunp goes full-on military raid and gets the whole world sicked on him. Like the whole rest of the world becomes the united superpower because they have a common enemy.

  • sith@lemmy.zipOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Also, EU probably needs it’s own stash of strategic nuclear weapons ASAP.

    • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 days ago

      France has nuclear weapons. And since Greenland and Canada are covered by NATO, they are also covered by the UK’s arsenal.

      Other NATO countries also have nukes provided by the US, but I don’t know how usable they would be in this situation.

      • marcos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        I have to say… On all predictions about how the World War 3 would start, I imagine absolutely nobody guessed “NATO against the USA”.

      • sith@lemmy.zipOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        The Nato weapons are basically US weapons. And the future of Nato is quite uncertain. Also, AFAIK the UK weapons force is fully dependent on the US. France is the only western country (except the US) which has a completely independent nuclear force.

        I really don’t understand the tactics of Trump here, since this behavior is guaranteed to push EU towards China. If common liberal values and culture are nil and there is global anarchy, China will be a natural EU ally, if one consider only the geography. China + EU vs Russia. And Russia will probably be an ally of the US. (I’ve played way too many strategy games.)

        Maybe he just sees that EU is really weak now, and he’s probing the landscape.

        Anyway, it’s interesting to see that the new US administration already performs hybrid war against the EU.

    • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 days ago

      It has it, the French decided to share theirs a while ago.

      FWIW official policy is that if US soldiers attack Greenland / Denmark, Washington goes to play Fallout.

      • themoonisacheese@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        France’s nuclear doctrine actually first includes a “nuclear warning shot”, which is fucking insane but makes some semblance of sense as in “we know what MAD is and we can play that game, but you should really reconsider”

        • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          To their merit, France starts remarkably few wars while hiding under their nuclear umbrella. And I know they still do fucked up shit, especially on their colonies but at least they are not invading Catalonia or Sardinia.

          • marcos@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            There are only a handful of countries around the world with that habit of starting international wars.

            (Civil wars are a different matter.)

            • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              You have been banned from ml - stating that anyone other than the US starts wars is McCarthyist propaganda.

      • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yes, Denmark is but Greenland is not. Greenland is considered an OCT, Overseas Countries and Territory, associated to the EU.

        • Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          France probably has a vested interest in ensuring that the EU defends overseas territories of its member states for some reason.

          • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Some of France’s overseas territories are actually part of the EU. It’s different than Greenland.