• NocturnalEngineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    176
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Majority of private jets carrying 3 passengers or less, releasing 10 times as much carbon per passenger than a commercial flight.

    As a peasant, I don’t think reducing my carbon footprint will offset the disgusting (increasing) display of greed from the elites.

    • Alto@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      100
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Perhaps the greatest scam the rich ever pulled off was convincing the common people that climate change is somehow our fault instead of theirs. A single billionaire harms the earth an order of magnitude more in a single year than most small towns will in a decade

      • eyy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        50
        ·
        1 year ago

        A single billionaire harms the earth an order of magnitude more in a single year than most small towns will in a decade

        But if you and your family stop using plastic straws, turn the heat down in winter, meticulously sort all your recycling and use public transport more for the next decade, you can help Jeff Bezos offset the emissions for his next weekend trip to the Maldives!

      • flux
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        In other words, if all the billionaires just ceased to exist, it would result in the humanity achieving the emission goals?

        • OrangeSlice
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean, that’s not strictly necessary either. Chinal allows a good many billionaires to exist, but they are hitting their emissions targets ahead of schedule, cause they don’t let the billionaires run the entire show like they do in the USA.

      • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s not neither only the rich nor only the poor, it’s all of humanity, and that’s not the rich saying that, it’s the IPCC. Now the rich (countries) of course have more means to lead the change and their guilt is much higher when they don’t.

        • loklan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          25
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well for example, I read the other day that 1 in 10 flights taking off from the UK are private jets.

          • Matt Shatt@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s very interesting.

            Majority of private jets carrying 3 passengers or less, releasing 10 times as much carbon per passenger than a commercial flight.

            As a peasant, I don’t think reducing my carbon footprint will offset the disgusting (increasing) display of greed from the elites.

          • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s funny and made me chuckle but it doesn’t substantiate the claim made.

          • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well sort of. The source says it’s from their investments, not from their lifestyle.

            Unless people have made an active choice to move their savings into an ESG pot, this will be true for everyone, just scaled according to the size of the pot.

            • psilocybin@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Sort of an important mention, yes, but also sort of skewed.

              As the article points out 50%-70% of their emissions are due to their investments, meaning those 125 billionaires still have more direct emissions of the size of up to half the country of france.

              And I don’t think its fair to equate having some little money in the bank, with employing brokers to ensure the exploitation of human labour and planetary resources enables you and your children to live in luxury without ever having to work

              The difference is living off of what you work for and needing a bank account vs living off of your capital (meaning other peoples labour)

              • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                But the “little money in the bank” is in aggregate making a huge contribution.

                So it’s easy to find the people who we want to blame big. But in aggregate we all have a role to play. That’s a harder message to swallow.

    • zephyreks@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The easy solution is to just directly tax carbon emissions and dump the money into methods to reduce emissions (transit, trains, green construction, agricultural controls, etc.)

      People don’t like taxes though, so this will never happen. An emissions-based tax is possibly the easiest way to disproportionately tax the wealthy.

      • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes!!

        I’ve long argued that courageous states should radically reform their tax system. Rebase the entire tax system around carbon tax, setting the level to ensure the state has the same income base.

        There’s a naturally progressive tax system built into that but we could make it even more progressive by laddering up the rates as the carbon emissions increase.

        • HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t think this type of policy is possible at the state level. The EU is gearing up for a carbon market on transportation. Carbon tax should come next, if we don’t let big money lobbies kill the policy.

    • HiddenLayer5
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      We might as well extract the fat from billionaires and burn them as carbon neutral fuel.

    • joelthelion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      We need both. The elite’s footprint is gross and disgusting, but we peasants are far more numerous, so reducing the elite’s footprint alone won’t do the trick.

      • McJonalds@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        the thing is, i will refuse to behave until the bigger misbehavers are held accountable

        • joelthelion@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          This kind of reasoning is why we are not making progress. It’s much easier to hold others to high standards when you’ve applied these to yourself first. The same goes for countries: it will be easier to pressure China/India when the West has done their part.

          • ghost_laptop
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            No, we are not making peogress because of your kind of reasoning. We need to make accountable to the bourgeois, the rulling class, even if the whole working class reduced its carbon footprint it would still not make a significant change, they must be replaced and forced to change their ways.

            • GBU_28@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              If all the rich were dead, the “normal folks” would still want 2 day shipping, cellphones every 3 years, non local ingredients, and fossil fuel cars.

          • McJonalds@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            how do you expect people to apply those standards to themselves before they are applied to the biggest sinners? most people don’t even buy how bad it is

            • joelthelion@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Doing our part includes reducing our consumption. Where things are produced doesn’t matter all that much for this part of the problem.

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Global industrial practices and corporations are the biggest offenders, by far.

          You know who uses all the shit they make?

    • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah I can recycle and grow my own food and compost and ride my bike and walk places as much as I want. It won’t save as much carbon in my lifetime as even one of these flights.

      It’s depressing, but I still do it because I don’t want to be part of the problem and I’ll need to know how to do these things when the world really goes to shit.