• Tiuku@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 years ago

    26 mins seems needlessly specific (and neither does the article claim that there’s a consensus on this point) but overall allowing and even promoting people to take naps during shift is certainly positive.

    • mekhos
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 years ago

      Some concise people might struggle with a slovenly nap unless it has such definition. I think its specified like this to appeal to the target audience.