• DankZedong @lemmygrad.ml
    9·
    1 day ago

    What makes you pro Christmas? Like I really enjoy this time of the year where I get to spend lots of time with my family and friends and I always have a great time. I think it’s a good tradition. But the actual holiday, I couldn’t care less.

    • 201dberg@lemmygrad.ml
      2·
      8 hours ago

      It brings some cheer to an otherwise gloomy season. I like the winter season mostly but the constant gray sky and leafless trees gets old and bums me out mentally. The lights and decorations cheers me up.

      Sitting in my living room with all the lights off save the Christmas tree and sipping some eggnog while it snows outside. This is what I live for.

      I don’t really care about the holiday either. I just enjoy the soft lighting and it being darker earlier in the evening. It’s more of the “theme” of it with the season. Like, liking the soundtrack of a movie or show you otherwise don’t give a shit about.

    • ☭ Comrade Pup Ivy 🇨🇺@lemmygrad.ml
      4·
      23 hours ago

      you see I have an active dislike for the holiday, Spending time with family and friends is the part I enjoy but there is so much hoopla and the entire world reshapes in this very difrent and artifical way, and if you say you dont enjoy a part of it your jumped on immedatly

    • ☭CommieWolf☆@lemmygrad.ml
      4·
      1 day ago

      Over the years the idea of spending an evening with my entire extended family gets less and less appealing. The older they get the more insufferable and opinionated they tend to be (Gen X/Boomers). The kids are usually a bit better off but not enough to salvage the experience. So on a personal note I’d consider myself anti Christmas.

      But this goes for any family oriented holiday, so not sure if it’s really any different in this case.

    • Noah Loren@lemmygrad.mlOPPortuguês
      2·
      14 hours ago

      In my defense, I didn’t create the graphic, I just shared the meme. And to be fair, Jesus was born before the creation of capitalism. But he never spoke out against class society - Nor against slavery, and he also considered divorced people who remarried to be adulterers. However, he never condemned homosexuality. But let’s not start a discussion about the theology of Christianity here! XD Lol!

    • deathtoreddit@lemmygrad.ml
      81·
      1 day ago

      The de’il, no

      He wasn’t pro-imperial, as much as he was an active pacifist, and perhaps subversive against the established Pharisee order (tho his actions in the temple, against commercializing his father’s house of prayer was somewhat militant)

      But as much as he may be relatively progressive for his time, his message is co-optable, especially when the Romans took up his movement to justify their empire

      Besides, he lived in a slave society, not a capitalist society… (are you a dullard?) How would he oppose something that did not came yet?

      • Finiteacorn@lemmygrad.ml
        41·
        1 day ago

        my point was not that he was pro capitalist but that he would be, since again he went around spreading imperialist propaganda. Liberals today give all kinds of lip service about billionaires being to rich and shit or corporations being too powerful and then turn around and show their true colors when it comes to the global south. And the reality of how he has been used to justify imperialism right before it became capitalism and while capitalism existed and today leaves very little doubt about what his teaching were all about.

        • deathtoreddit@lemmygrad.ml
          2·
          7 hours ago

          And his fate that he was executed by the Roman gov’t and its Judean Pharisee collaborators, for challenging the latter, and to an extent, the former’s rule

          Was he pro-imperial when he got killed for that, like the commenter said?

          • Finiteacorn@lemmygrad.ml
            2·
            4 hours ago

            no but he was when he told people to pay their taxes and be good slaves. Think about it this way if a liberal journalist for example wrote an article exposing some of the extreme excesses of capitalism and got assassinated for it does that make them anti capitalist even if they generally support it?

            But the way i see it it doesnt matter, your argument is just kinda irrelevant to me, the fact that his words and actions can support a pro empire and pro slavery view at all is enough because that is what it has been used to support. For example if a right wing politician cultivated and empowered and dog whittled to a following of people who some minority and this resulted in hate crimes i dont care if their official stance is that hate crimes are bad and that whichever group their following targets is great, the actual result of his actions and words are what matters and that goes double for a figure like jesus who if there is any truth to his existence it most have been very different from what the stories if for nothing else because many of the stories are contradictory or magical, the man simply is what people have made of him, and people have made him a symbol of empire and capitalism, i mean christmas IS pure consumerism.

        • Red_Scare [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
          10·
          1 day ago

          No idea why you’re being downvoted comrade.

          New Testament was written in the time of widespread slavery and this is what it had to offer:

          Slaves, obey your earthly masters with respect and trembling, in singleness of heart, as you obey Christ, not with a slavery performed merely for looks, to please people, but as slaves of Christ, doing the will of God from the soul. Render service with enthusiasm, as for the Lord and not for humans, knowing that whatever good we do, we will receive the same again from the Lord, whether we are enslaved or free.

          Pretty sure if capitalism existed at that time, it would have the same advice to give wage slaves.

          • deathtoreddit@lemmygrad.ml
            3·
            10 hours ago

            Edit: ok I think you’re proving my point, that verse is Ephesians 6:5, which is a letter written by Paul the Apostle (note that this guy is a ex-Pharisee Roman-turned Christian, who has many reasons to co-opt his message)

            Here’s an actual verse from Jesus

            In Luke 4:18-19, Jesus quotes Isaiah in his mission statement: “He has sent me to proclaim freedom for the prisoners and recovery of sight for the blind, to set the oppressed free.”

            Now, frankly, both Jesus and Paul did use language of slave-master relationship, but it doesn’t necessitate that to earthly masters, at least in Jesus’ case (as he was a rebel and troublemaker to the local Roman-collaborator Pharisee order) , but merely to God

            In fact, I’d prefer this interpretation of Christ, as a culmination to Jewish liberatory practices against debt

            Nathan: I just pulled up the full text from Leviticus Chapter 25, verse 10: “Proclaim liberty throughout all the land unto all the inhabitants thereof: it shall be a jubilee unto you” (with reference to the Jewish word for the periodic debt forgivenesses). And then the last line, “you shall return every man unto his possession, and you shall return every man unto his family.” So that’s interesting. So with the mention of Leviticus Chapter 25—this is really the part of your whole rap, sir, that I just find to be absolutely electrifying—could you describe to us how Jesus fits into this situation as the culmination of Jewish prophecy, as a product of Jewish tradition, and describe Jesus’ role in all this, as described in Luke Chapter 4?

            You can read more from Michael Hudson’s article

            • Red_Scare [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
              2·
              10 hours ago

              Bible is extremely self contradictory, you can fish out quotes to support nearly anything, as proven by history over and over: https://philb61.github.io/

              What Bible simply does not offer however, is a direct condemnation of slavery which would only take one short passage. There’s nothing to counterbalance the quote I pasted above, or the quote from the old Testament discussed here: https://time.com/5171819/christianity-slavery-book-excerpt/

              Given how self contradictory the Bible is, support for slavery is one of the very few points you can get from it with any level of certainty. You can do some mental gymnastics and infer a condemnation of slavery from general statements like “setting the oppressed free”, but then you can make pretty much any other concievable point by selecting the passages that can be interpreted to support your point, and ignoring the passages where your point is directly and explicitly refuted.