Summary

Special counsel Jack Smith dropped 44 federal charges against Donald Trump, citing DOJ policy that sitting presidents cannot be prosecuted.

The charges, including election interference and classified documents retention, could be refiled after Trump’s presidency.

Critics, including Rep. Dan Goldman and former Capitol officer Aquilino Gonell, decried the move as a miscarriage of justice, asserting it places Trump above the law.

Trump and allies celebrated the decision as a victory, with Vice President-elect JD Vance vowing to prevent similar prosecutions.

Democrats fear Trump will seek political retaliation, deepening national divisions.

  • aarRJaay@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    37 minutes ago

    English person here: I didn’t think he was classed as ‘sitting’ until he was officially voted in with the Electoral College and sworn in. Surely there’s still time to prosecute.

  • xenomor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    The United States is a fucking joke. The nation supposedly founded on the rejection of a king believes that one person is literally not subject to US law. I could not have more contempt for, or feel more shame about being an unwilling participant in the unprincipled hypocrisy of this absolute shit hole of a country.

    Fuck the oligarchs that run this place. Fuck the fascist Republican Party. Fuck the cowardly Democrats. And fuck the moronic, fear-riddled people.

    • Treczoks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      That is the biggest and most obvious show of the corruption of the US American “justice” system. It was long known as the best “justice” money could buy, but this is open disregard of any legal principle.

      • slampisko@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Well it’s still the best justice money can buy, just in a twisted, sinister kind of way and with a big emphasis on the money part

  • Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I told my wife 4 years ago when these charges came in “If this becomes more than a slap on the wrist I will be amazed”, I am not amazed.

  • LotrOrc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Wow I’m so shocked

    Had 4 years to sort this and out the fucker in jail for treason and decided to dick around doing fuck all til a few months before the election.

    Biden has the blood of 100,000 on his hands and the death of democracy in his lap. That’s his legacy.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      36 minutes ago

      Personally, I think the administration dragged its heels because it was stupid enough to want to run against Trump again. After all, if they had the bogeyman incarnate to run against, they could move to the right and still be second worst. And second worst wins elections, right?

  • blazera@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Lot of good that decrying’ll do now.

    Democrats are done, elect a progressive party

  • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    102
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    sitting presidents cannot be prosecuted.

    The charges, including election interference

    🤡

    Election interference is legal if you do it so well you win.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    144
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 hours ago

    If only we still had another month with a Dem president and his AG controlling the DOJ…

    I mean a month is a short time, ideally we’d have had that the last four fucking years and had plenty of time to handle this.

    • DancingBear@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      82
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Fairly certain and it appears obvious the DOJ believes the president is totally immune.

      Part of the reason we are not members of the ICC.

      Part of the reason Dick Cheney is not in The Hague right now.

      Fairly certain United States has been a fascist country since at least 1790

      • UsernameHere@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Every single time someone tries to hold Trump accountable he claims it is a witch hunt.

        Every single time the charges don’t stick because of intimidation or corrupt judges the public believes that it is a witch hunt just a little more and it is harder to get people to take it seriously.

        This has happened so many times now that he has been able to win an election as a felon.

        The DOJ knows that even if they successfully charge Trump now, his administration will get him out of it. Their only hope is to put it on pause and wait for an opportunity to actually hold him accountable. Because there is no way that can happen after he won an election.

        • UltraGiGaGigantic
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Because there is no way that can happen after he won an election.

          “A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one.”

          • Alexander Hamilton
        • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Their only hope is to put it on pause and wait for an opportunity to actually hold him accountable.

          it’s fucking over. he won the election, and he’s going to fucking pardon himself, die, or both before anyone holds anyone accountable.

          he’s going to gut any functional part of the legal system and get no reprimand.

        • eran_morad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          that fat fuck’ll be long dead before any justice could ever be served. justice within the legal system, that is.

        • reddit_sux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          According to what I heard on youtube from US lawyers, the statuette of limitation will run out by the time Orange Goo finishes with his current term. Leading to no trial. There is no pausing.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I wouldn’t go that far back, or say we’ve been a fascist country for that long.

        I put a lot of blame on Dems closing ranks for Bill back in the 90s.

        The root of the argument is semantic: The President has testified that he did not touch Lewinsky sexually. Lewinsky’s testimony, and that of her friends and colleagues claim he did.

        But the bottom line is whether this constitutes an impeachable offense. Again, Starr’s report claims there is ample evidence of Clinton lying under oath, and concealing evidence of his relationship with Lewinsky to begin impeachment proceedings. Lawyers for Clinton declared today that the President’s transgressions were “personal,” but do not constitute an impeachable offense.

        https://www.cbsnews.com/news/did-clinton-lie-under-oath/

        Like, people still act like trump has some mastermind legal strategy when he’s just ripping off Bill by blurring the line between president and person.

        At the end of the day for decades both parties have agreed that regardless of which one of them is in charge, no one gets any consequences from the others.

        We can’t count on those groups holding each other accountable. Voters need to hold at least one party to a higher standard, or literally no one is ever going to be held accountable.

        • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Until we have a different electoral system there is no way to hold a party accountable without losing an election.

          • njm1314@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            Pretty sure y’all just lost the election spectacularly, so might as well hold the party accountable now that the worst has already happened.

            • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              They already think it’s cause they didn’t go far right enough. They’ve got their heads up their asses as always and won’t change as always.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            10 hours ago

            For an honest attempt at it?

            No, it’ll never be a fair fight.

            But if we want a Dem primary in 2028, we need to keep demanding it, and we need to solidify around a candidate ASAP.

            Voters beat the party in 08, and they’ve had to walk back a lot of what Hillary changed in 2016 to prevent that.

            I still feel crazy that everyone ignored what happened to NH this “primary” but I don’t think we’re really at the point where Dems just appoint candidates without a primary.

            We just need a candidate that refuses to concede until more than a handful of chosen states vote.

              • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                9 hours ago

                Certainly the game is rigged. Don’t let that stop you; if you don’t bet you can’t win.

                As true today as in 1987 when Heinlein wrote it

    • SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      How about 2.5 years in which everyone held off because they didn’t want to step on the FBI’s toes, and it turned out that they weren’t doing anything?

    • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      This is just like Obama giving Bush and Cheney a pass for war crimes and starting a war based on complete lies.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Yep. None of this is new, it’s the same song and dance.

        I’ve criticized both parties for acting like voters have the memory of goldfish, but it’s getting harder and harder to argue they’re wrong.

        People don’t remember the shit they literally lived thru already.

    • bostonbananarama@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      You’re talking about a criminal case, what does a month do for you? At every turn, Trump has consistently tried to delay the process. It has nothing to do with the DOJ or AG, they are working the system to intentionally delay everything until now. Why proceed either, he’s going to be president in two months.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        9 hours ago

        He’s making a facetious point about the huge quantities of time Merrick Garland had to waste to create this outcome.

    • UsernameHere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      10 hours ago

      The Russia/Republican propaganda has been too strong to make anything stick. If you try to arrest Trump while he has enough followers to win an election then you’ll get a mob like Jan 6th storming whatever prison he’s held in.

      It’s not as simple as you’re trying to make it sound.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Give me a break. These charges could have been pursued on day one, in Washington DC.

        The administration sat on their hands.

        • UsernameHere@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          Why do you think they “sat on their hands”? Do you think they are conspiring to help Trump? Do you think your internet armchair analysis of the situation is better that the entire DOJ and they just aren’t as smart as you?

          Or is it the obvious answer that Trump has been able to get away with corruption time and time again due to Russian/republicans? And their control of our government and justice system? And the DOJ knows that if they try to prosecute Trump and the charges don’t stick that they won’t get another try.

      • emax_gomax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Sounds to me like a perfect recipe to round up and arrest a bunch of traitors to American principles. Was the thought trump would just shut up and quietly go away if we kept biding time or he lost another election. What, if anything, about trumps character would make anyone think that. 100% the government just dropped the ball on this. They won with trump in the opposition and wanted to time it well enough to win again and have him divide and weaken the republicans.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    I’m actually kinda OK with this considering the circumstances.

    With the republican’s capture of the presidency, congress, and the SCOTUS, there’s no way he’s going to suffer a day for his charges if the court pursued them.

    The main problem was not sentencing him quickly when they had the chance. That’s the major fuckup.

    Anyway, the dismissed charges are without prejudice. Which offers the opportunity (assuming trump survives his presidency, we don’t end up with a de facto republican dictatorship, etc) that he can be sentenced after his presidency.

    But we all know how the courts love sentencing rich old white dudes.

    • asteriskeverything@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I see it as a white flag. It’s not gonna happen now, and it isn’t going to happen later either. This battle they lost and that’s that.

      Democrats need to start worrying less about Trump the person and more about the potential ramifications we will face in the near and farther future. It seems Democrats have a 5 year plan and Republicans have a 50 year plan, that’s why they keep gaining power and favor.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      How so. Legally he can’t take office according to the constitution. And thereby his charges in Georgia and NY would hit him still, as Vance couldn’t pardon state charges. But yeah, we knew this would happen

  • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    "President Trump is still liable for everything he did while he was in office, as an ordinary citizen, unless the statute of limitations has run, still liable for everything he did while in office, didn’t get away with anything yet – yet.”

    — Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY), on February 13, 2021, arguing against the need to impeach Donald Trump.

  • morgan423@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    It seems counter intuitive, but you want as little of this of this floating around as possible while he’s in office. Act like nothing’s pending throughout his term, then reopen this the minute he’s out.

    We don’t need him having more motives to try to dictatorially stay in power after his term, and stuff like clearly pending trials and sentencings hanging over him the moment he leaves the WH could give him that extra incentive.

    • UltraGiGaGigantic
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      This is how our nation falls. Not with a bang, but cowering and whimpering.

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      63
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      then reopen this the minute he’s out.

      I’ll take shit that will never happen for $800, Alex.

        • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 hours ago

          And I’m not sure which would be worse. Vance might be a bit more moderate on some things but his competence and ability to work with others makes him more dangerous on those.

          • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 hours ago

            I’ve been debating this with myself, and my conclusion is that Trump might be worse because Vance is at least a politician. He has some knowledge and “respect” (maybe) for the trappings of the office, whereas Trump gives no shits for rules or regulations and is all too happy to trample on every right and freedom we have.

            But who knows, I could go both ways on which would be worse.

      • morgan423@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Nothing for the Federal stuff, I guess.

        He can’t pardon the state felony convictions he has, though. That’s the case that worries me in this regard.

        • Nougat@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Oh yes you can.

          Ford’s pardon of Nixon states:

          Now, Therefore, I, Gerald R. Ford, President of the United States, pursuant to the pardon power conferred upon me by Article II, Section 2, of the Constitution, have granted and by these presents do grant a full, free, and absolute pardon unto Richard Nixon for all offenses against the United States which he, Richard Nixon, has committed or may have committed or taken part in during the period from January 20, 1969 through August 9, 1974.

          Whether or not any crimes were charged is irrelevant. Whether or not any charges were made and then dropped is irrelevant. “All offenses.”

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      The charges, including election interference and classified documents retention, could be refiled after Trump’s presidency.

      Yeah, like he’s not going to view that as something hanging over his head the next four years…

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          On a side note “Life and Times of Tim” is one of my favorite shows and why Im always willing to explain things when I see that little picture of his face.

          But mate…

          America has literally already had a literally demented Republican president who was an actor when younger.

          This is just a reboot of Reagan, and while we may hear about Trump’s stuff while it’s happening, I’d be surprised if he causes more harm in the next four years than Reagan did.

          And when Reagan got too bad, his VP did take the reigns and the next election.

          Back then it was HW Bush, who was the ex-head of the CIA and the son of one of the Business Plot leaders where American capitalists were floating the idea of overthrowing FDR and the American government to join WW2 with the actual nazis…

          So if Vance ends up running things in 2 years and being the candidate in 4 years?

          Shits been worse before.

          For fucks sake, Reagan’s handling of AIDS and literally smuggling crack into poor communities is still fucking shit up forty years later, not even getting into Reaganomics.

          They both sucked, and Trump’s next four years will suck. But it ain’t the end of America unless everyone gives up without a fight.

          • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)@badatbeing.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Regain (and Nancy x100) were both racist bigots, but Trump (and Vance will be if it gets him attention) are fascist wannabe dictators that have plans of dismantling the whole government, healthcare, and education systems in the US. They have plans to help further the Rights push for voter suppression and ways to cheat (and/or exploiting loopholes without shame).

            So Nancy might have shaped dementia Regains policies for the worst, and Bush Sr. may have committed all sorts of crimes against humanity using the CIA, but Trump plans to run us into the ground and sell the scrap to whatever dictator says the nicest things to him.

            And Vance may be even more dangerous in that he will have zero control of his party, and will changeling into whatever he’s told to be by whoever will let him be “President”. He would sell his family for fame “or whatever makes sense” in his void of emotion brain.

            • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              have plans of dismantling the whole government, healthcare, and education systems in the US. They have plans to help further the Rights push for voter suppression and ways to cheat (and/or exploiting loopholes without shame).

              All things Reagan also worked towards…

              It’s the same thing, we just find out about it faster now than we used to. And the country was starting out in a better place when Reagan had his turn as far as regulations to prevent it.

              So things will suck, but it’s nothing new. That doesn’t mean give up, it means keep fighting and plan to keep fighting for as long as we’re alive even if a Dem is president in 2028, don’t get complacent. Because both parties have spent the time since Reagan deregulating shit like campaign finance, which has allowed the wealthy to tighten their grip on both parties

              • Doomsider@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 hours ago

                The only thing that Reagan worked towards was the jar of jelly beans in the Oval Office. He was an actor and the last three years his mind was gone to Alzheimer’s.

                Now if your meaning Reagan as you in his apparatus that actually made all the decisions then yes you are correct.