• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 years ago

    I understand the point you keep trying to make, but it’s pretty clear from the last chart I linked in the last comment that the distribution is fairly even. My title didn’t assume an even distribution, it assumes a fair distribution.

    The two studies I linked very clearly indicate that the share distribution is a factor in employee engagement and motivation. If the share distribution was highly skewed then the shares wouldn’t play a factor in employee engagement.

    The second study in particular compares Huawei with ZTE that has a traditional corporate structure. If your assertion was correct then we wouldn’t see the difference between the two.

    • ree
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      I’m not gonna continue that cyclical dialogue any longer.

      There is no factual number of shares distribution amongst employee. My assumption is that as any large corporation a few makes bank and many get the crumbs and it’s as good as any.

      I’m sure employees are more motivated once they own stock but that’s a process you also find in other companies structure and it’s probably a well documented incentive. However, HR is not a topic I’ve interested in.

      Have a nice day.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 years ago

        Your assumption is completely baseless, but there’s clearly no point continuing this.

        Have a nice day.