• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
    link
    -12 years ago

    I understand the point you keep trying to make, but it’s pretty clear from the last chart I linked in the last comment that the distribution is fairly even. My title didn’t assume an even distribution, it assumes a fair distribution.

    The two studies I linked very clearly indicate that the share distribution is a factor in employee engagement and motivation. If the share distribution was highly skewed then the shares wouldn’t play a factor in employee engagement.

    The second study in particular compares Huawei with ZTE that has a traditional corporate structure. If your assertion was correct then we wouldn’t see the difference between the two.

    • @ree
      link
      22 years ago

      I’m not gonna continue that cyclical dialogue any longer.

      There is no factual number of shares distribution amongst employee. My assumption is that as any large corporation a few makes bank and many get the crumbs and it’s as good as any.

      I’m sure employees are more motivated once they own stock but that’s a process you also find in other companies structure and it’s probably a well documented incentive. However, HR is not a topic I’ve interested in.

      Have a nice day.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
        link
        -32 years ago

        Your assumption is completely baseless, but there’s clearly no point continuing this.

        Have a nice day.