Plays stupid games, win stupid prizes as the saying goes.

      • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just because you can’t read or interpret most of the articles or dara you spew out doesn’t mean the rest of us are similarly challenged.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh, I think you’ve given us plenty of proof of just how challenged you are. Your lack of self awareness is just a cherry on top. You’re like the embodiment of the Dunning-Kruger syndrome.

          • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well, of course you think that. From the false data you constantly propagandize, you demonstrably believe that no means yes and 1 = 4

            Telling that Dunning-Kruger is the first technical term you bring up that you might actually know the definition of.

              • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Any data that is not independently verified (ie, your hopeful propaganda), I don’t like.

                Unlike you, I don’t chill for a single entity, I simply like people to be properly and fairly informed.

                You can refer back to the article that has actual data from multiple countries that count the number of false data used in Chinese scientific articles. If you’re confused about actual data versus wishful thinking.

                  • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Ah yes, purporting an argument for another since you can’t counter their actual point.