Plays stupid games, win stupid prizes as the saying goes.

  • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just because you can’t read or interpret most of the articles or dara you spew out doesn’t mean the rest of us are similarly challenged.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh, I think you’ve given us plenty of proof of just how challenged you are. Your lack of self awareness is just a cherry on top. You’re like the embodiment of the Dunning-Kruger syndrome.

      • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, of course you think that. From the false data you constantly propagandize, you demonstrably believe that no means yes and 1 = 4

        Telling that Dunning-Kruger is the first technical term you bring up that you might actually know the definition of.

          • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Any data that is not independently verified (ie, your hopeful propaganda), I don’t like.

            Unlike you, I don’t chill for a single entity, I simply like people to be properly and fairly informed.

            You can refer back to the article that has actual data from multiple countries that count the number of false data used in Chinese scientific articles. If you’re confused about actual data versus wishful thinking.

              • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Ah yes, purporting an argument for another since you can’t counter their actual point.

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  There is no actual point to counter. You’re evidently claiming that CSIS data is not reliable and called it Chinese propaganda. I can’t believe you provide this level of entertainment at no charge.

                  • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Whatever your reason for doubting CSIS is, dont attributed to me. You have plenty on your plate as it is without making up claims by others.