Plays stupid games, win stupid prizes as the saying goes.

  • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ah yes, purporting an argument for another since you can’t counter their actual point.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      There is no actual point to counter. You’re evidently claiming that CSIS data is not reliable and called it Chinese propaganda. I can’t believe you provide this level of entertainment at no charge.

      • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Whatever your reason for doubting CSIS is, dont attributed to me. You have plenty on your plate as it is without making up claims by others.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not the one doubting CSIS who made the report that China’s gallium restriction are a national security threat to US.

          • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well, if you read reports from more than one country, you might not blindly believe every headline you specifically search for.

              • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m constantly questioning myself. That’s why it’s so easy for me to discredit your propaganda.

                You might want to read the articles connected to some of those headlines you frantically copy and paste, and then look for corroborating verified articles from a different source. Yhen, come to your own conclusion that cannot be refuted according to the data you’ve gathered(stop making unverifiable claims that are so easily refuted is a good first step), and you might actually be able to make a coherent post!

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  If you think that making glib comments full of personal attacks is what discrediting means then you’re about as smart as I thought you were.

                  • APassenger@lemmy.one
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Jesus you’re prolific and ubiquitous.

                    You win the glib trophy on this branch. Not them.

                    You really need to check yourself. You are galvanizing people into positions you want them to move off of. Are you doing this on purpose?

                  • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Personal attacks? That’s your style(you’ve said “your shithole country, dummy, sniffing glue”. I attack propaganda.

                    Keep it up though, it is funny when you prove yourself wrong like this.