https://t.me/pflpgaza1/14794

Press release

🔴The Popular Front calls for a boycott of the Democratic and Republican parties and stresses the necessity of not voting for advocates of genocide and supporters of colonialism.

• The Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine calls on the free people of America, especially the supporters of the Palestinian people, the Palestinian and Arab communities, and the organizations of blacks and minorities, to boycott the Democratic and Republican parties in the American elections scheduled for tomorrow, which share clear colonial goals aimed at exterminating our people and strengthening the Zionist settlement project.

• These two parties were directly involved in the ongoing war of extermination against our Palestinian and Lebanese peoples, and they never concealed their blatant bias in favor of the occupation, and their continued support for its racist policies that target the existence of our Palestinian people and uproot them from their land.

• The positions of the two American parties reflect an explicit adoption of ethnic cleansing, and legitimize the Zionist crimes and massacres against our people, through financial, political and military support for the Zionist entity; the statements of the symbols of these parties also seek to beautify and justify their imperialist policies that adopt a colonial language, which sees the Palestinian people as an obstacle to their alleged “civilizational project”, and their election campaigns ignore the horrific crimes committed daily against Palestinian civilians, especially women and children, in an attempt to cover up the true face of the occupation and legitimize its crimes.

• The Democratic and Republican parties also continue their attempts to attract the support of Zionist lobbies and influential people, in efforts that aim to strengthen the policies of mass displacement and organized repression against the Palestinians.

• In this context, the Popular Front renews its explicit call to all honorable people in American society not to vote for these two parties that use American tax money, which is sucked from the blood of the American people, to support the Zionist genocidal regime.

• The Popular Front sees boycotting these two Zionist parties in tomorrow’s American elections as a moral stance no less important than any other form of solidarity with the Palestinian people and the rights of oppressed peoples. It is also an effective means of struggle to expose the falsehood of American slogans that speak of freedom and human rights. The United States, through its political tools, is trying to exploit these concepts to justify its crimes and consolidate its hegemony over peoples, without caring about the rights of the Palestinians who are subjected to the most heinous types of crimes.

• Finally, the Front considers that the boycott of the two parties is a clear internal message to the American administration and the international system around it that those who collude in shedding the blood of our people and displacing them should not receive the votes of the free people of the world and our communities, who refuse to be contributors to their election or false witnesses to their criminal policy in power.

Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine Central Media Department 4-November-2024

Original post by @SovietReporter@lemmygrad.ml

      • geneva_convenience
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Yes. Greens and PSL have advocated to vote for each other in four states where only one one of the two is one the ballot.

    • PolandIsAStateOfMindOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      Nowhere in this address PFLP call for boycotting the entire elections, but only to boycott two main parties.

    • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      So you feel that your life and the world will be no different between Trump and Harris? One of those two are going to win.

      • تحريرها كلها ممكن
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        If Harris truly saw Trump as a threat she would have at least come out against the genocide so that she doesn’t risk losing votes over it.

        • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’m taking her at her word. I think she’s being honest. She’s a Zionist, like Biden. I think that she wants to help Palestine, but with push coming to shove, she’ll support Israel over Palestine every time. This means that the genocide will continue, and the Palestinians will be run out of their country.

        • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          OK but that’s not what I asked. Do you feel that your life and the world will be the same regardless?

  • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    Pro tip: If anyone is trying to convince you not to vote, they do not have your best interests in mind.

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      They aren’t saying you shouldn’t vote. They’re saying you shouldn’t vote for the Democrat or Republican.

  • swordfish@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    Is this the same popular front for the liberation of Palestine that described the US as their enemy and biggest evil in the world? Warning that a day of reckoning will come on which the US will pay the price for their behavior? They dont sound like someone one should base their voting preferences on, sorry.

    • TheLepidopterists [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The United States is currently committing genocide against them. Why would they not describe the US as their enemy and the biggest evil in the world?

      What kind of attitude do you think a resistance group should have to a political power that’s committing genocide against them?

    • FuckyWucky [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      US did pay the price once, very small for what it did, 9/11.

      And Bush killed millions afterwards. Now the Democrats want to work with the same Republicans.

    • Erika3sis [she/her, xe/xem]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      One of the PFLP’s songs refers to America as the “Head of the Snake” specifically, which is coincidentally not actually dissimilar from Benjamin Franklin’s own choice of political symbolism — except Franklin, radical that he was, chose to represent the Thirteen Colonies as a whole snake rather than just the head.

      In any case the PFLP didn’t choose to hate the USA, in the same way Ned Kelly didn’t choose to hate cops. Acting like the PFLP’s hostility to the USA is completely irrational and literally just came out of nowhere helps nothing except Septics’ cognitive dissonance about the nation’s grotesque banditry abroad — it’s just wilful ignorance, it’s pure and simple “My Little Pony logic” to act as if the world’s anti-Americans are just Evil Changelings who hate “a beautiful land abounding in the Magic of Friendship” for no reason other than that it is “a beautiful land abounding in the Magic of Friendship”.

    • dontgooglefinderscult@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yes, they consider the sole manufacturer of the weapons that kill their children and main financier of the people using the weapons that kill their children their biggest enemy.

      Like with 9/11, the US deserves to pay a price for its active role in genocide.

  • TheSlad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    There is no moral choice regarding the palestine situation in this election. If both parties support the genocide and colonialism of Israel then boycotting solves nothing, one of the parties is going to win anyways.

    This leads to the conclusion that the situation over there should not be a factor in how Americans vote. There are other issues, both domestic and foreign that hinge on this election and are still worthy of voters.

    • Taalnazi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      Nederlands
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Boycotting will solve one thing, that parties won’t care about your electorate. If enough people do so, then a party might want to take a stance supportive of Palestine, and gain the votes of that electorate.

      That said, it is def important to now vote.

      • NovaPrime
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Agree with the theory, but in practice what happens is the parties simply focus on courting the people who do vote and shift their attention to them even more, ratcheting the discourse further to the side that tends to have voters show up more reliably. It’s far cheaper and easier to nudge a willing and reliable buyer (in this case, voter) to buy your wares than it is to go out and bring new buyers into the existing market. Not impossible, but I personally don’t have faith in the plutocratic two party system the US has to self-reflect and seek out those disengaged voters instead of taking the easy route and pandering to the existing and reliable voter pool (at least not in the short term).

        • geneva_convenience
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          That is false. When one of the two parties is desperate enough for those anti genocide votes they will cave. A third party is not required to win. The two major parties can win over their voters. If they so desire.

    • dontgooglefinderscult@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Well that’s one way to justify explicitly supporting genocide. Not very effective for humans, but you people never did have much humanity in you, did you?

      • NovaPrime
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s basic game theory. You can be pissed and dehumanize people as much as you want, but there is exactly 0% chance that neither one will be elected today. Considering the fact that elections aren’t single issue referendums, complaining about people not throwing away their only voice and change influence option (their vote) is sophomoric and naive.

        • PolandIsAStateOfMindOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          So the game theory says the votes are at the same time not important because either way genocider will get elected but at the same time so important you absolutely MUST vote (for whom? Surely not for one of the genociders)? Sounds like a pretty stupid theory.

          • NovaPrime
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Your premise is disingenuous and/or purposefully limited. You’re artificially pegging the value of voting against a single issue outcome, but that’s not how voting works. As previously stated by OC, there are a number of issues on the ballot. Your premise that votes are not important because they won’t change the outcome of a single issue does not mean that we can extend that same to all other issues and nullify the value of voting altogether.

            Also, OC’s comment said nothing about anyone being required to vote, rather it’s simply pointed out that anyone demanding you not exercise your only influence option does not have your specific best interests in mind.

            • PolandIsAStateOfMindOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              So it’s not the game theory fault, it’s just you think that genocide is acceptable.

        • dontgooglefinderscult@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yeah no, sorry fascist, I’m not greenlighting or encouraging or voting for your genocide.

          More importantly, IF THERE IS ONLY ONE ACCEPTABLE CHOICE, ITS NOT DEMOCRACY, IF YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED AN OPINION THAT ISNT STATE SANCTIONED, YOUR VOTE IS NOT YOUR VOICE.

          My voice is that genocide is unacceptable, even as a lesser evil, as it never stops itself or limits itself. Jews weren’t the main target of the Holocaust, in the beginning, it was socialists and communists, state enemies, and then the list grew. In every single case of genocide so far, once it gets momentum and gets approved by a populace, it just spreads until the offending nation is forcefully eliminated.

          And we’re seeing that. From Palestinians to now all arabs. I mean have you looked at your ideological twins on redd*t lately? I haven’t seen that level of anti Arab hate from liberals since 2001, and Biden not only signing off on but actively sending troops to help Israeli expansion of their genocide is crazy.

          So again, I’m not voting for your genocide, I don’t support it, and I will protest you until I’m your victim or all of you are permanently out of power and afraid to ever admit you supported genocide.

          • NovaPrime
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Bud, take a deep breath and go for a walk. I’m not your enemy. Nor am I a fascist.

            Your anger at your impotence, while understandable, is misdirected. I agree that the US veneer of “democracy” is thin at best and laughable considering the corpocratic influence and control of media, elections, and politics in the US. But you are still allowed to voice your choice without fear of consequence or repraisal from the government. That by definition makes it democratic.

            • dontgooglefinderscult@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              If you voted to continue and expand genocide, you’re a fascist. It doesn’t matter whether you prefer the next victims be Mexican or more of those scary arabs you people hate.

              • NovaPrime
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                Not what fascism is, but alright. You do you. Good luck with that moral superiority. I’m sure it’ll make a real, tangible difference in the real world any day now.

                • dontgooglefinderscult@lemmings.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  You people have never been stopped by voting; as an aside you’re right, fascism is just the combination of corporate and state power according to Mussolini. I’m sure that’s where all fascists ended it right?

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t think that it should be about boycotting. I think it should be about supporting the candidate who best supports your values.