I’m uncertain if deepfake porn should be banned; it’s already difficult to enforce copyright on the internet, because it’ll just get redistributed.

Similarly, it would be impossible to enforce restrictions on deepfake porn; because it can easily be redistributed.

    • @xpladv570@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      82 years ago

      yep, enter the post-truth era where you can’t prove anything. era where you can’t trust any of your senses, aside from the gut maybe.

      this will shake the very foundations of human societies, not for the better. BUT COOL FUNNY MEME POTENTIAL YEAA!

  • I don’t think it’s a matter of copyright, it’s slander. It’s demeaning for women to have their faces shown in porn videos they had nothing to do with.

    • @AgreeableLandscape
      link
      9
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      It’s also sexual abuse, on the same level of taking a nude picture without their knowledge and posting it publicly.

      That already two crimes: taking an intimate picture without consent, and sharing an intimate picture without consent. So why aren’t people getting punished?

      • AmiceseOP
        link
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        deleted by creator

        • @AgreeableLandscape
          link
          22 years ago

          I wouldn’t assume that the source image was taken illegally; it could be a picture that the person consented

          Yes, but unless they consented specifically to having porn made from those images, that’s still highly problematic.

          • @electrodynamica@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            02 years ago

            But only because that’s where technology is today. You need many images of the face at many angles, and it is only a face swap of real video that was captured.

            Within 50 years it will be possible to create complete fakes from whole cloth. No images, no video as a source. Only a person’s imagination. At that point it is equivalent of cartoons.

      • @electrodynamica@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        You realize people are born naked, right? The whole concept that someone being seen “uncovered” is somehow sexual, or that the act of uncovering is somehow a sexual invitation is itself rape culture.

        Just as much as men should be allowed to wear dresses, and women wear pants, people should be able to remain or become naked and not have it mean anything.

        Of course self-determination is implicit here. So what of deepfakes then, where a man is say photoshopped into a dress? Does that mean his rights have been violated, because people might believe that he intended to present himself that way to the world? I say no.

        People try to picture random people they come across in public naked all the time. So what if they were a great artist and could draw or paint a hyper realistic representation of what they imagine? What if one day we have the technology to pull an image from someone’s mind? Is this person now committing a thought crime? Does it only become a crime when it is shared with another person?

        TLDR people need to be less repressed, not more. Repression is what gets us to crazy accusations of thought crimes and abuse-by-proxy.

        • @morrowind
          link
          22 years ago

          I have no clue how you came to conclusion that slander & sexual harrasment makes someone less repressed.