• notfromhere
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Not to mention their “1080p” streams look worse than 2013 480p streams. The site is a dumpster fire.

  • RangerJosie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    YT Exec - /rips massive line of coke off Intern’s ass/ - “Remove View Count”

    YT Engineer - “But Sir, users will hate that. It will actively make the user experience worse”

    YT Exec - “That’s the goddamn point!”

  • Hal-5700X@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Good thing we have Youtube alternatives. The two biggest ones are Odysee & Rumble. Also we have Peertube. The problem with Peertube is people don’t use it. So it haves less content on it.

    If you’re going to watch Youtube, use a Frontend. For same reason Privacy Guides don’t have Grayjay on it.

  • dinckel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    124
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    It’s already really difficult to engage with the content you want to see, but now they’re also taking away the only immediately noticeable metric of a successful video? Genuinely just why

    • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      109
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      They removed the star system a long time ago. They removed the down votes again a few years back.

      They want their algorithm to be the only thing that decides whether you watch a video or not.

      • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        70
        ·
        6 hours ago

        That’ll work excellent for all those people trying to find tutorial videos for ‘XYZ’ when you have no verification data to determine whether it’s even a legit tutorial.

        • calabast@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          30
          ·
          6 hours ago

          People who watch tutorial videos only get on, watch the video and then leave. How are they supposed to make tons of advertising revenue from that? No, we must sacrifice that class of video from the platform, in pursuit of the almighty dollar.

          • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            5 hours ago

            I mean you joke, but they’re literally doing that to reaction video channels. MXRPlays had his entire channel deleted, despite having millions of subscribers. It was clear for years that someone at youtube had a grudge against them.

            Especially since they deleted their channel. Gave strikes to all their videos, and took the videos down. Buuuuuuut, someone ELSE illegally reuploaded their content, and they can’t even report the video because their channel is deleted. The illegal re-uploads have no strikes, no issues, the content stay up, and some OTHER person makes money off of MXRPlays years old content.

            • Pika@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              the content creator isn’t following the proper system then. You don’t need YouTube to do a copyright/IP violation claim. Google is actually opening themselves up to significantly hot water if they are indeed refusing to allow a process for DMCA on creators that are deleted off the platform, as there are severe penalties for not reacting to a DMCA claim when you are a content provider.

              If they actually owned the rights to the videos, that creators first step when learning that Youtube is not going to do anything about the violation, is to manually file it themselves, and honestly they should state that Youtube at that point is intentionally allowing it which would perhaps pull Youtube into it as well

              just because YouTube decides that they aren’t going to do anything, doesn’t invalidate your claim to copyright. I’m surprised that the channel hasn’t seeked legal action against anyone regarding it.

              My two cents on the matter is that it’s likely the channel is worried that their videos aren’t transformative enough fair use wise and that they themselves may get into legal troubles if they attempted to. A lot of commentary artists stay borderline on fair-use and not fair use, however if this was not the case, they have a pretty decent chance of winning that suit.

              • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Oh, if you follow the channel, it’s CLEAR someone, probably just the one person, has a clear vendetta against Henry And Jeannie (MXRPlays). They used to know one person at youtube. So when they’d get their channel strike, they’d email him, and he’d review what the strike was for.

                It was stuff like “Advocating child harm”.

                The guy would look at the video in question, and see no evidence of that. No children in the video. No discussions of child harm. Any human without a grudge could see it was a false autobot ID. So he would remove the strike. Then the next day, the strike would be back. He’d email the guy, and the guy would look through the logs, and find it was done by a human working for youtube. He’d remove the strike again, but he’d tell them "I can’t remove it again. If he puts the strike back, it goes above me. Then the strike would be put back…and it would have to be waited out. The strike stays on your account I think they said 30 days. And if you get 3 strikes at the same time, the channel gets suspended.

                So they wouldn’t upload any more videos, and then 3 days later they’d get another strike on a video that was 4 years old. Clearly not a bot, since bots generally don’t seek out old content with no activity.

                And the same situation would ensue. They hung on, and kept doing this cat and mouse game for 8 years. Until the guy they knew at youtube left the company. And then they had no one to delete strikes. Any calls to anyone at youtube were ignored. And the channel wasn’t even suspended, it was terminated.

                And when this other guy is reuploading their old stuff on his own personal channel, youtube says they have no way to DMCA it because the original source file, the proof that he has to say it’s his content, was deleted. Because his channel was terminated.

            • tabular@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 hours ago

              What type of reaction content? If it wasn’t using the minimum amount of copyrighted material needed to comment or being transformative, and was distributing the majority of a work, then at any point a DMCA will nuke em. Google might not think it’s worth the risk hosting that reaction content forever.

              • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Basically they go on reddit, and will browse subs like “instant regret” or “maybe maybe maybe” or “yes yes no”. Basically just subs where people post videos of themselves, doing whatever. Essentially it’s just Americas Funniest Home Videos, but with their commentary using reddit as the source of the videos.

                So, I’m not sure anything is actually “copyrighted”.

                • tabular@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  I doubt that would be the reason for their ban. If it is a creative work then in some countries it’s automatically copyrighted, but it’s not like most would go out of their way to stop it (unlike with like people reacting to other YouTube videos, films, anime, etc).

          • Jo Miran
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            5 hours ago

            LOL. You clearly have never heard of G.A.S. (gear acquisition syndrome). You get on YouTube to learn how to play guitar and next thing you know you’ve bought three guitars, a closet full of pedals, amps, amp modelers, etc., and you still don’t know how to play.

              • Jo Miran
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                edit-2
                5 hours ago

                Of course it does. You go in for a lesson and fall down the gear rabbit hole. Next thing you know you are watching endless hours of gear reviews and demos. A lesson is a single video where gear videos is an entire genre.

    • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Too hard to manipulate the algorithm with ai spam, disguised ads and propaganda if users can see all the videos at the top of their recommended feed have 20 views.

      You must only view what the Corporation approves.

    • Cheesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      To hope you find new content. YouTube had been putting random low watch count videos in my feed. I never click on them because of their low view count. The thumbsnails make them look like they’re high quality videos. Without the view count I have no idea if they have 1,000 views or millions. They’re hoping I will click on them, subscribe, and spend more time in the app.

    • umbrella
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      45 minutes ago

      some internal metric and testibg said this increases engagement by 2.1% so now we are stuck with it.

  • Computerchairgeneral@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Thanks Youtube, I hate it. Like I can see some arguments for taking away the view counter, even if I think it’s a bad decision. But the date the video was uploaded? Who does that even help? I guess Youtubers will either need to start properly dating their videos or we’ll just have to use context clues to figure out when a video was uploaded.

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      But the date the video was uploaded? Who does that even help?

      There’s gaming content that expires within a month, especially with frequent balance and other game changes, like with League of Legends. I won’t watch a video that’s weeks old because what’s being featured probably doesn’t work anymore after a patch.

  • Pika@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    5 hours ago

    this would essentially kill my method of viewing videos on the platform, this isn’t a boost to interaction they think it will be, it will ultimately result in me watching less videos as I won’t have the ability to decipher trash from good, so I’ll just stick with content creators that I am used to and no longer branch out like I currently do.

  • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Seems like a sure way to lose my engagement. I don’t understand what Google thinks they’re getting out of this except for flooding you with more ads between video recommendations at the cost of people actually watching anything and using the damn website.

    Between removing the dislike counter, a defect search bar that shoves garbage down your throat, recommendations of decreasing quality on my end and shorts (which I hesitantly gave a try but ultimately lost all interest in because it remained mostly low effort content despite my efforts to train my algorithm), this is just another reason why I find myself spending more time enjoying other things lately.

    Maybe I am just out of touch, but I smell another bubble bursting when I look at how enshittified all major web services are simultaneously becoming.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      45 minutes ago

      Maybe I am just out of touch, but I smell another bubble bursting when I look at how enshittified all major web services are simultaneously becoming.

      It feels like something has to give, right?

      We have YouTube, Reddit, Twitter, and more just racing to enshittify like I can’t even believe, Google Search is racing to destroy the internet, yet they’re also at the ‘critical mass’ of ‘too big to fail’ and shoved out all their major competitors already (other than Discord I guess).

    • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      except for flooding you with more ads between video recommendations

      That’s literally it. The advertising and marketing teams within Google have politically maneuvered themselves into running the show, and the software/product engineering teams that want to maximize the quality of the system they work on (search, youtube) are overridden by insipid metrics that advertising needs more user interaction with ads.

      They literally have been commanding that things be made more shitty to optimize their malformed metrics. You absolutely can get more people to click the sponsored search results… if you keep making them less distinct from the actual results. And advertising needs those good click through rates nooooow!

      There are email chains documenting this sort of shit going on that have become part of the public record due to various court cases.

      Wonderful article about it all here

  • Rob200@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 hours ago

    You know why they might be hiding upload dates? My theory is, Youtube doesn’t really want you looking at new stuff. (Very apparent by the algorithm) they want you looking at specific news stories, and specific content but not constantly seeking new uploads from independents.

    But that is just a theory a plain theory. Thanks for watching.

    • dumbass@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I hate how now when I watch a bunch of videos from a creator, my YouTube feed ends up only having that creators videos, like yeah I’m enjoying this person, but I do like to watch other things as well.

      It feels like I’m being forced into an echo chamber.

      • Z3k3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        The one that gets me is watching a new creator to me on a subject I’m interest in e.g. gaming and it turns out that said creator so has a right wing nut job catalogue and that’s all that fella my feed for the next two weeks.

        My time is limited I just want to relax on my down time and ain’t interested in rage bait but that’s all yhe algorithm seems to want to show me every chance it gets by me clicking on a new name

      • Rob200@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I can’t even use my home screen due to my Google account settings. What i’l do is do a search by date and subscribe to any good channels I like to ensure I get a curated feed for me on Youtube.

  • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I don’t understand why they on such a self destruct path?! I already barely use this fucking platform anymore because of how shitty it has become already, and now they want to bait me into watching some low views garbage on top of all that? WHY?!

    • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Because when you get pissed off at one shitty video and click off it to find a better one, that’s free real estate in which to double your ads.

      And what are you gonna do? Go to Peertube? YouTube is too gigantic to have a real competitor no matter how much we try. It is a beast so massive and bloated at this point that we just can’t kill it without legislative interference. And Google knows damn well that they’re basically the only game in town so they aren’t afraid of significant user backlash.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        41 minutes ago

        There is a breaking point, eventually. YouTube’s trajectory is gonna make next quarter’s revenue great, but eventually something else will pick up user’s attention instead.

  • Kokesh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Why? Is everything going to shit? Like counts, view counts, dislikes … I suppose it won’t change anything for me on reVanced, but still… why?

  • paraphrand@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Does TikTok show view count? This seems like a move that is intended to compete with TikTok.

  • brap@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    How about you test marking videos as watched across devices so I don’t have the same shit pushed back at me all the time.

    • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 hours ago

      HOW ABOUT YOU STOP SHOWING ME ALREADY WATCHED VIDEOS IN GENERAL?! Why fill my home feed with shit I’ve seen already? I literally have to click (…), click (not interested), click (why?), click (I’ve already seen the video) FOR EVER SINGLE VIDEO I EVER WATCHED ON YT.

      • brap@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Interesting thought, might have to dig into that. Hadn’t considered it messing with play history.

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    In the future you’ll pay $900/mo to stare at a blank page.

    And you’ll have to because all the free sites are entirely ads.

    • Pika@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      You joke but like, they are already pushing a twitch style sub model pretty hard already with the youtube “private sub” system that creators can do, it grants you access to videos that the creator marked as a subscription only, which is basically the same thing, as it shows you the video, and a tiny “sub only” label, and when you try to open it it brings you to the sub page.

      I forsee in the future youtube moving to a fully monetary model with only brand issued content being “free” and everything else requiring youtube premium