cplusplus@programming.dev to Open SourceEnglish · 15 hours agoWhy Veracrypt not flatpak?message-squaremessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up14arrow-down120
arrow-up1-16arrow-down1message-squareWhy Veracrypt not flatpak?cplusplus@programming.dev to Open SourceEnglish · 15 hours agomessage-square8fedilink
minus-squareReversalHatchery@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 hours agoand then what’s the benefit of having veracrypt as a flatpak package? that it can be used with older dependencies? if so, is that a good thing to have for things that modify system startup?
minus-squareJustMarkovlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 hours ago and then what’s the benefit of having veracrypt as a flatpak package? Flatpaks is a universal package format, it works almost everywhere. Also, there are immutable distros, that use flatpak as the default package format.
and then what’s the benefit of having veracrypt as a flatpak package? that it can be used with older dependencies? if so, is that a good thing to have for things that modify system startup?
Flatpaks is a universal package format, it works almost everywhere. Also, there are immutable distros, that use flatpak as the default package format.