• barsquid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Can someone make a supercut of all the far-right dumbasses saying we cannot have a president who is under investigation? Might have to go back to 2016 to get clips, I don’t think they say that any longer.

    • pingveno@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      43 minutes ago

      Everything she does will be timed to coincide with the heat death of the universe.

  • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 hour ago

    One-thousand eight hundred eighty nine pages. One-thousand eight hundred eighty nine (I’m not going to parody the rest of the song this is a lot)

  • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The courts have at least 1,889 pages of evidence of election interference, and yet they will still leave him on the ballots for the highest office in the country.

    This right here is the very definition of lip service when it comes to justice. It’s time for America to nut up or shut up. Either way, I’m damned tired of this bullshit.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      As much as I hate it, it would be much worse if you could just accuse someone of a crime to keep them off the ballot. Someone like Trump would abuse it to accuse his opponents of crimes to have them removed. It needs to go through the court first. The issue is that’s taken far too long, and the time it takes has been increased by certain people with a bias.

      • m0darn@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I agree that the problem is not with him being on the ballot, the problem is that it seems an enormous portion of the population of the USA are willing to vote for him.

        • pingveno@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          41 minutes ago

          Yup, can’t get rid of someone like Trump if enough of the population is either willing or eager to go along with him.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Due process exists for both the innocent and the worst out there. You want that to be there to protect you and everyone else.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    4 hours ago

    That Judge’s niece is friends with someone who Donated to Biden so OBVIOUSLY we need to INVESTIGATE the JUDGE for Corruption!

    -Republicans who LOVE Eileen Cannon and the Supreme Court!

  • runiq@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Thanks for providing a direct link to the documents, OP. Much appreciated :)

    • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      88
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      cant reason someone out of a position they didn’t reason themselves into

      thanks for the correction

    • satanmat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Correct, when “facts” come from TD they matter; otherwise your”facts” are safe to ignore

    • usernamesAreTrickyOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I think there’s a chance swaying a little more people than we might think - even if it’s a small percentage overall that can be swayed

      Look for instances at the audience reactions to his lies about January 6th at his Univision Townhall. They show visable disgust

      https://xcancel.com/MeidasTouch/status/1846746612980199817

      Even if it’s not enough to make them vote the opposite way, it might be enough to make them not show up to vote against harris. Turnout changes in single digit percentages matters a lot

        • usernamesAreTrickyOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Note that polling doesn’t capture turnout data rather well. It has to make assumptions about turnout for weighting

          The closets metric polls have to try to guesstimate turnout is enthusiasm, which is down ~15% for trump compared to 2020. In 2020, there was a enthusiasm gap in Trump’s favor. This year that’s flipped

          Or if we look at say a subgroup like Niki Haley primary voters (~5-10% of republicans), there’s a marked drop in their support for Trump this year compared to 2020

          The majority of them, 59%, said they voted for Trump in 2020. But now, only 45% plan to cast their ballots for him again in 2024, marking a 14-point difference.

          https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/national/article293768789.html#storylink=cpy

          Overall, this will probably look like small movments if it materializes, but in elections won on close margins this absolutely matters

          • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I agree thats prob the best proxy. I don’t know that we’ll get any exit polling data from GA or NC yet, but the turnout numbers hopefully look good good for Harris. She needs wide margins to keep this out of the SC.

    • _bcron_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 hours ago

      They redacted like 95% of the stuff so doubftul. Most of the pages are just blank

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Who’s the type of person that’s still undecided but would be swayed by some new relevation on Trump? At this stage you either don’t know anything because you don’t follow the news, you already know he’s a criminal and a piece of shit, or you just think the media is making stuff up because “they’re out to get him”.

        There’s no piece of news that could possibly change things at this stage, besides him dying or something.

        • WrenFeathers@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          I’d like to agree with this. But the fact is- we live in a reality in which not only a 34x convicted criminal/rapist is allowed to run for president, but has an actual chance to win.

          If this can happen, then so too can there be undecided voters.

        • wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          6 hours ago

          This may not sway them to vote Kamala, but it absolutely may sway them to abstain from voting.

          I mean, think about all of those Michiganders who are staying out this year due to Gaza.

          Negative press absolutely can sway voters, even this late in the game.

          • jonne@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            56 minutes ago

            Yeah, agreed. The whole Democrat talking point about Trump being worse is just so played out. If you personally care about the issue and if both choices to vote for are pro genocide, it’s definitely valid to stay home or vote third party. It’s the only leverage they have.

        • usernamesAreTrickyOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Keep in mind it also gives people canvasing to lower-information voters something to mention

          As an example, I was talking to someone undecided a bit ago who didn’t follow news super closely and said education was their top issue. They looked completely taken a back when I mentioned how Trump has said he wants shut down the department of education (both from him directly and it’s Project 2025)

        • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          100%.

          There’s no piece of news that could possibly change things at this stage, besides him dying or something.

          Here’s hoping. There is one minor cohort of voters out there still to get; Democratic/ Democratic leaning voters who can’t bear to vote for genocide. All other matters are settled. The idea of “swing” voters is this weird political mythology that just doesn’t manifest in modern (post 2000) elections. You don’t win an election post 2000 chasing after the center, you win it by driving out your side. Trump understands that and he’s done probably the best job he could have to do so. If you are a Trump supporter or lean Trump; you are voting Trump this election cycle and you are voting. If you are a Democrat or Democrat leaning, you are almost assuredly voting Kamala, but at least some small fraction of Democratic aligned voters are still holding back over the Israel/ Gaza issue. That small fraction, maybe 2-5% of totals voters, are the last remainder to be “got”. They won’t be “got” by Trump, but may can be left on the table by Harris.

          • bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Yeah anyone with a brain knows that it would be worse under a republican.

            People decrying genocide aren’t being honest. They know who the real warmongers are.

            • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              4 hours ago

              People decrying genocide aren’t being honest. They know who the real warmongers are.

              I’m sure calling people who oppose genocide dishonest is gathering heaps of voters for Kamala.

      • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        At this point, if a voter is conflicted between a prosecutor who has spent the majority of her life putting criminals away and a racist who has several felony convictions and several more pending, they are effectively Trump voters.

        It’s really that simple. Anyone else who tells you that they are undecided is because they are racist or they are okay with fascism.

        • WrenFeathers@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          My response to a similar rebuttal:

          I’d like to agree with this. But the fact is- we live in a reality in which not only a 34x convicted criminal/rapist is allowed to run for president, but has an actual chance to win. If this can happen, then so too can there be undecided voters.

          There will always be a grey area.

    • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Trump voters won’t care. But some republicans that lean centrist do exist, maybe it’ll finally convince them to have some decency.