I am fully aware that I am about to clang some cymbals, and there’s nothing I can do to stop it.
We’re cymbal folk. The few not the many.
I’ve got a whole repitoire.
Did you know that the Cubic represention of color that computers use is inherently flawed?
Did you know that cucumbers are melons and that all fruits are vegetables, just like root, tubers, and leaves?
Did you know that a lot of things we take advantage of in our conscious experience can vary wildly like a lack of different types of bonding modes, the ability to and qualia of distinguishing senses, and the little tools like facial recognition and speech synthesis can malfunction?
Did you know that cucumbers are melons and that all fruits are vegetables, just like root, tubers, and leaves?
Botanical vs culinary
Vegetables are a social construct.
It may be inherently flawed, but we can’t just arbitrarily emit wavelengths of light with current technology. Realistically I doubt we ever could, we would need to alter the emission energies of materials on the fly, which would be akin to actual magic. It is frankly amazing it works as well as it does notwithstanding.
I don’t think that’s what they mean. Because our cones send a signal for only 3 colors of light with overlap. We detect 3 and our brain interpolates the rest.
Cubic color? What do you mean? I’ve always seen color spaces represented as triangles filling the curve.
I don’t know if this is what the parent poster was talking about, but color pickers in many programs present you with a cubic representation of their available color space. The default Windows color picker does nowadays as does Corel. Maybe Adobe too, but I haven’t used any Adobe software in years so I don’t know how they do it now.
Since computer monitors suck at truly displaying three dimensional information [citation needed], you’re presented with a rectangular slice of a cube. Here’s the Corel color picker, for instance:
The X axis is saturation, the Y axis is intensity, and the “depth” or Z axis is hue, which is controlled with the little slider on the bottom. As you move the slider up and down your “viewpoint” of the slice moves up and down through the depth of the cube, essentially representing it in 256 little vertical slices (or however many based on your bits-per-pixel).
Despite being the graphics nerd that I am, I can’t tell you off the top of my head how this cubic representation is flawed, although computer monitor color rendition itself is inherently flawed because most color spaces probably can’t actually fully represent all the colors that normal human vision is capable of differentiating, but what the hell do I know. Browns and oranges are famously difficult to reproduce with only red, green, and blue, the usual three additive colors available to you. The cube map itself, at least, gives you a spatial method by which to select any of the 16581375 possible RGB values actually possible an 8 bit per pixel format, even if the methodology for presenting them all to the user might not quite make intuitive sense.
You can also do cubic map of only hues, with each axis in the cube corresponding to red, green, or blue, like this one courtesy of Wikipedia:
Some of those things you just said made no sense to me and I want to know more about all of them.
I’m fully aware of what I can do to stop it.
But then other people wouldn’t get to gear the wonderful clanging sound!
And they need to know!
So stop it I shan’t.
I do possess the ability to shut the fuck up, just usually not the willpower to follow through with it.
I posses the ability and the willpower to shut the fuck up, but I’ve had to deal with everyone else’s bullshit long enough, they can deal with mine for a change.
“soda makes me hyper”
Then they briefly acknowledge you before returning to whatever uninteresting topic they were already discussing and tighten the circle so that you could not join in even if you wanted to…
You look around the room and everyone is in tight circles, making mostly small talk, with a few people in each circle dominating the conversations. At best, all you can do is stand outside a circle, essentially eavesdropping, but that’s creepy.
So you just wander the room admiring the art and architecture, look out the windows, etc., before either finding a way to leave or finding a quiet corner and pulling out your phone.
Basically this
More like the one where there’s three panels, a group of people on the right side. Then the middle one, some guy just gives a big thumbs up before returning to their circle while the left person is talking about whatever.
Then they briefly acknowledge you before returning to whatever uninteresting topic they were already discussing
The fact that you call their topic uninteresting means you don’t care about others but expect them to care about you. That is you being self centered. You expect others to listen to your interests without first listening to theirs.
That means taking a real interest in their topic even if it’s something stupid like sports. If you don’t know enough to contribute the conversation that means you are learning something new- which is a good thing.
And just because you listened to them doesn’t mean they immediately owe you to listen to you.
read the room dude.
I don’t care about what kids think about me. I’m trying to help.
Being different is fine. The post above mine was embracing being a narcissist. It’s a variation of this attitude:
On the subway I’m more Homer
I didn’t argue against what you said because technically you’re correct. Divorced of all context, I’d agree with you. However, in the context of the current conversation, I see why the majority of opinions are downvoting you (it’s actually closer now than it was when I previously commented, so let’s see where public opinion goes).
As I already said, public opinion doesn’t matter to me.
“Do you guys know about Free and Open Source operative systems?”
"Also, have you heard about decentralized and federated social media platforms? Well- "
2 hours later “… Which brings me to the importance of self-hosting, and that is…” and you go on for hours totally oblivious, the friend that usually gives you social cues is crying in the corner…
“Do you guys know about Free and Open Source operative systems?”
what are “operative systems”?
😉
systems which do not merely operate, but have active agents (“operatives” if you will) that act in murder/plot intrigues in the background to keep the systems running. The less you know the better.
They’ve killed so many child processes, oh god, the blood
All those dangling function bodies… and there come the garbage collector.
using forks no less
XD english isn’t my 1st language and the auto correct got me this time
ah the famous “cant leave the conversation till I am done” nape lock
If only I was comfortable touching other people, then I could subject them to my inane ramblings EVEN LONGER!.
I’ve learned from Professor Oak about how there’s a time and place for everything but not now.
You can’t stop me from riding my bicycle indoors, grandpa!
I don’t do great with “normal” conversations. I actually love it when someone brings up some random ass special interest. This allows me to have a clear decision tree A. I know nothing about this, but it sounds interesting, here is an opportunity to learn. B. I know a little bit or maybe even more about this than this person, let’s nerd out a bit C. This doesn’t sound remotely interesting to me - I don’t like talking all that much anyway, but this seals the deal, I’m Noping the hell out of this conversation asap.
So thank you to all you autistic conversationalists for smashing your cymbals!
Me wanting to know what my friends think about superdeterminism while we play monster hunter
superdeterminism
Is that like supermarionation?
Am disappointed it’s not Super Mario Nation related.
My disappointment is immeasurable and my day is ruined.
Oh wow that was a deep rabbit hole. So if I’ve understood correctly, by super determinism, the outcome of the big bang has more influence on the measurement of particles than particles have locally with one another.
If two particles are entangled, “independent” measurements to verify this are contaminated by their causal connection to the big bang, which will still give readings that the particles are entangled.
Or, if I have a bag with an orange and an apple, I throw one at random to Alice and one at random Bob, Alice catching an orange has nothing to do with Bob catching apple, but more to do with the which side of the bag the apple was leaning on in the bag initially?
Is that right?
Thats correct. Superdeterminism suggests that the initial conditions of the universe, like the state of the big bang, could be responsible for everything that happens, including our measurements and decisions. In this view, all particles, including those measuring the experiment, are part of the same predetermined system. So, when we talk about entangled particles, their behavior is not just influenced by their local properties but also by the shared history of the universe.
In your apple and orange analogy, it’s less about which side of the bag the apple leaned on and more about the fact that the bag, the apples, and even Alice and Bob’s actions were all predetermined by the conditions of the universe at the big bang. Alice catching the orange and Bob catching the apple wouldn’t be a truly independent or random event—it would be the result of an unbroken chain of causality going all the way back to the beginning of the universe.
I think I understand it now, but damn that’s just… weak?
It’d be like me smoothly sidling up to a pretty girl in a bar and saying “HEY GURL, YOU DON’T KNOW ME AND I DON’T KNOW YOU BUT YOU AND I SHARE THE SAME MOST RECENT COMMON ANCESTOR OVER 155,000 YEARS AGO AND CAN I BUY YOU A DRINK EVEN THOUGH THERE IS NO UNCERTAINTY IN YOUR DECISION AT A COSMIC LEVEL.”
It just feels wrong to do that to women.
I don’t know if I didn’t understand that because I’m too drunk, or because I’m too stupid. It’s probably both but I really want to come back to this sober so I can try again.
Another person mentions Gerry Anderson-related topic
Slowly begins raising the cymbals
Holds up a triangle and nods
DEW IT!
plays the theme to ghost busters, whilst everyone looks super disappointed
The fiend teeth makes this
I learned to just keep it to myself.
I used to do that too, but then I learned how to gently build enthusiasm and also when to know the signs of when they’re losing interest.
We need your guidance. NOW!
inhales smoke
But I’m retired chief, I jus can’ parley so good no morsad introvert noises
Fuckem.
also, cool username.
also also, I used to do that too. It would be rude to interrupt, and they’re probably not interested in what I have to say anyway, right? Fuckem. I’ve dealt with their bullshit for figuratively ever. Fuckem. They can deal with my bullshit for a change.
I will to you the power to subject your bullshit onto those assholes.
deleted by creator
I just assumed the other people were hallucinations. Happens to all of us, right?
Totally unrelated, but you should check out 20 em 1 for the Sega Master System!
I have a Master System and haven’t even heard of this title before!
Me with linguistics and technology, lol.
I want to get into linguistics and technology, too…
Then go into it. For these two there’s a lot of resources online, although if you want to go deeper into linguistics field, I guess you’d need to either go to university or find good resources elsewhere (books, etc. (Well, you probably can find these online as well)). It’s just phonetics (in lingustics/) that might be hard to learn on your own, since you might make errors without proper instructions from an experienced person, or at least that’s what I’ve heard.
Yeah tough to find someone who likes anime…
![Special interest [Sarah Anderson]](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/98b34dbe-6445-40aa-9955-e8cf2de5f373.jpeg){kind=link}