It’s been like this for a while.

Switch to NetBSD instead, please.

Dude, what you give LLM is not instructions. It doesn’t follow your instructions. It brings you back what might look like you want.

A CPU, on the other hand, carries out the instructions exactly like you’ve said.

There is no way to avoid incorrect answers from LLM. It’s probablistic; there is always a chance of getting a wrong answer no matter how you improve it. With a CPU, you can reduce errors by improving the design. It’s based on physics; it’s logical.

I advice you to stop treating LLMs as blackboxes and only observe it from the outside. You’ll never notice the difference if the error rate is low enough.

As a person with normal eyesight, quiet cars are great. Loud cars make me angry. But quiet cars are lethal to blind people, so fuck all cars.

Oh I know who he was. I just can’t quite accept who he is.

There is still a distinction between bad human-written source code and AI slop.

The human holds the copyright of his work and can do whatever he wants with it, including distributing it under a open/libre license, i.e., open source.

AI slop? Not so much. The model is very likely trained on stolen work. It’s tainted. Nobody owns the copyright of everything it generates. No one can “open source” it. The license every one receives is voided.

And both who (intentionally) releases bad code to the crowd lack the spirit of open source, but the AI one is also right out illegal.

Perhaps that’s the problem. If it’s bad, I can still tell and choose not to read it. If it seems to make sense but actually not, I’m just going to waste my valueab time.

It is now called ”Done".

Please?

Link to the official website, will you?

https://blog.documentfoundation.org/blog/2026/10/09/tdf-visual-identity/

Excuse me, do you call this open source?

For real. I can open source my valueable projects to you. But what if I deliberately make it hard to read, like mangling it or minifying it?

Hell, every piece of JavaScript code on Earth is technically open source. If you can read assembly, everything is open source.

Only having the source code distributed is not open source in spirit. The intention of opening the source code is welcoming auditing, learning, contributing, to name a few.

“Opening” the source code of slop, with tons of meaningless boilerplates, non-logical paths and flows, heavily coupled modules and functions, thousand-line long functions, achieves none of the purpose of the intention.

Official news here.
https://www.gentoo.org/news/2026/10/07/infrastructure-sponsors-wanted.html

The UI is a hard port from desktop, but nonetheless totally usable, as the user would be using external input devices anyway.

Oh, nice, you judge by the name, which is so lame because I can press charges when someone shouts in a tree hole, which connects to Yggdrasil.

No, apparently she wasn’t hosting any server.

And yes, I also don’t think that constitute as transmitting.

Which server? Is the victim to be owning the AI server and constantly reading all messages sent to it?

Dude, how is talking to AI transmitting the message? If you have kidnapped someone and about to ask for ransom, would you a) call his family or b) tell ChatGPT to notify his family???

This. The law says, “to send, post, or transmit a written or electronic record.” How is talking to AI satisfying the threshold of sending, posting, or transmitting?

Some say people are hard to work on. I’d say you just need to work on stupid people.

Nice boobs.