I like how all the comments in that thread start with “I’m not a Marxist-Leninist…”. Seems like the thread shows this pretty much doesn’t happen in practice. And it would frankly be surprising if it did, because Marxism-Leninism is a well thought out theory, while Anarchism is a loose ideology at best.

I see them shitting on Grover Furr as usual

Can anyone tell me why any criticism of Grover Furr are just ad hominem attacks on him being a “Stalinist”?

Can anyone point to why no one can criticise his actual writing?

I had a period in my teens where I switched to anarchist but then I reread theory and got better.

God, I wish I could press a magic button to make all Anarchists read a book. If we could convert all western anarchists to MLism, that would like at least double the size of our movement in the west.

I tried to make a thoughtful comment without being a dick, I pray one person reads it and it starts their journey. lol