We’ve had some trouble recently with posts from aggregator links like Google Amp, MSN, and Yahoo.

We’re now requiring links go to the OG source, and not a conduit.

In an example like this, it can give the wrong attribution to the MBFC bot, and can give a more or less reliable rating than the original source, but it also makes it harder to run down duplicates.

So anything not linked to the original source, but is stuck on Google Amp, MSN, Yahoo, etc. will be removed.

  • geekwithsoul@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    As someone who raised this issue, I want to thank the mods for addressing this. The MBFC bot aside, I think this will also cut down on dupes, as I’ve seen numerous times where an article was shared twice- once from the OG source and then another version from MSN or Yahoo news.

    And for users who want to check the source of something, it does make it easier to fact check for yourself.

    Who knows, it might even slow down certain profligate posters who obviously just take every link in a news aggregator and share it (and then brush off every comment with a “I didn’t write the article…) 😉

    • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      I don’t want to assume who you are referring to, but for me personally, I don’t think it’ll slow anyone down. Why would it? Posting is a simple cut-and-paste of web addy and article title. Takes exactly the same time regardless of source: just a few seconds.

      So it’s just as easy to post from original sources, but now not all people on Lemmy will be able to read the article because some sites paywall.

      I have lots of news subscriptions (I love political news), so not an issue for me personally, but I can see how it may frustrate some readers. But it doesn’t bother the person posting at all, because they’ve already read the article.

      I think the new rule is perfectly fine though, and I’m happy for anything that will remove some of the criticisms I see regarding false accusations of trying to hide sources.

      So I think you had a great idea and I’m happy they implemented it! Thank you! :)

    • reddig33@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      People usually link to sites like MSN and Yahoo because the content is no longer locked behind a paywall. 🤷‍♂️

      • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Yep, that was a big reason. I subscribe to a few sites, but I realize not everyone does. And MSN links came up on my newsreader, but I have no problem just posting from direct sites. I do expect people will complain about the paywall though, but oh well.

      • geekwithsoul@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Many of the articles I’ve seen are not in fact behind a paywall but obviously YMMV

          • geekwithsoul@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            I said they were profligate in their posting, not spamming. Say, for instance, users with 1.6k posts in around 60 days. Personally I feel they have been spamming, but the mods think differently and that’s fine. However they are pretty universally regarded as posting and commenting to an unhealthy degree.

            • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              13
              ·
              edit-2
              16 hours ago

              Lemmy is a small, but growing community that needs more content to compete with Reddit. Prolific posters are actually something to celebrate for helping the community grow. In my personal opinion.

              I actually wish there were more prolific posters and more posters in general.

              And of course, we can always block posters if we don’t want to view their content. :)

              • geekwithsoul@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                12 hours ago

                Wow, speak of the devil! Lemmy growing for the sake of growing just recreates Reddit. Every forum is dominated by a super minority of posters, a small minority of commenters, and a super majority of lurkers. Nothing has changed about that since the Usenet days you claim to be old enough to remember.

                Posts without thought or of low quality encourage people to go elsewhere. The answer is not more crap posted by more people, it’s quality posts from diverse users with healthy and good faith discussions. So basically the opposite of what you do with the volume and choice of articles you share, and your rampant attempts to stifle and distract from constructive discussions in the comments.

                Poorly sourced and written articles presenting issues without context are not only actively harmful to this community but harmful to the prospect of Lemmy and the fediverse as a whole. The fact that this is something you don’t recognize surprises me not at all.

              • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                14 hours ago

                It doesn’t need your posts, as evident by the massive amounts of downvotes your propaganda receives. No one is celebrating you.